From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Date: 2021-05-10 12:50:20
The conditional by the generic header is the same,
hence drop unnecessary duplication.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
v2: rebased on top of v5.13-rc1
arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
@@ -2,10 +2,6 @@#ifndef _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H#define _ARCH_ARM_GPIO_H-#if CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO > 0-#define ARCH_NR_GPIOS CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO-#endif-/* Note: this may rely upon the value of ARCH_NR_GPIOS set in mach/gpio.h */#include<asm-generic/gpio.h>
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
The conditional by the generic header is the same,
hence drop unnecessary duplication.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>
I think this should go into Russell's patch tracker for convenience,
if you're not familiar with it I can sign it off and put it in there,
just tell me.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden> Date: 2021-05-20 08:18:32
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:26 AM Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The conditional by the generic header is the same,
hence drop unnecessary duplication.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>
I think this should go into Russell's patch tracker for convenience,
if you're not familiar with it I can sign it off and put it in there,
just tell me.
Nope, I'm not. Please do, thanks!
Since he kept silent I suppose it means an agreement on the change.
It's quite straightforward and can be tested easily.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Date: 2021-07-12 13:37:07
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:18:11AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:26 AM Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 1:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The conditional by the generic header is the same,
hence drop unnecessary duplication.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>
I think this should go into Russell's patch tracker for convenience,
if you're not familiar with it I can sign it off and put it in there,
just tell me.
Nope, I'm not. Please do, thanks!
Since he kept silent I suppose it means an agreement on the change.
It's quite straightforward and can be tested easily.
Any new on this, please?
It's kinda not good when the (simplest) patch is stuck like this :-(
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel