Thread (67 messages) 67 messages, 6 authors, 2021-04-14

Re: [PATCH v2 17/21] dt-bindings: ipmi: Convert ASPEED KCS binding to schema

From: Andrew Jeffery <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-09 05:33:37
Also in: linux-aspeed, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, lkml, openbmc


On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, at 14:45, Zev Weiss wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:27:48AM CDT, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
quoted
Given the deprecated binding, improve the ability to detect issues in
the platform devicetrees. Further, a subsequent patch will introduce a
new interrupts property for specifying SerIRQ behaviour, so convert
before we do any further additions.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <redacted>
---
.../bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc.yaml | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
.../bindings/ipmi/aspeed-kcs-bmc.txt          | 33 -------
2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc.yaml
delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed-kcs-bmc.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..697ca575454f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/ipmi/aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc.yaml
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml
+
+title: ASPEED BMC KCS Devices
+
+maintainers:
+  - Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
+
+description: |
+  The Aspeed BMC SoCs typically use the Keyboard-Controller-Style (KCS)
+  interfaces on the LPC bus for in-band IPMI communication with their host.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    oneOf:
+      - description: Channel ID derived from reg
+        items:
+          enum:
+            - aspeed,ast2400-kcs-bmc-v2
+            - aspeed,ast2500-kcs-bmc-v2
+            - aspeed,ast2600-kcs-bmc
Should this have a "-v2" suffix?
Well, that was kind of a matter of perspective. The 2600 compatible was 
added after we'd done the v2 of the binding for the 2400 and 2500 so it 
never needed correcting. But it is a case of "don't use the deprecated 
properties with the 2600 compatible".

I don't think a change is necessary?

Cheers,

Andrew

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help