# Re: \[PATCH\] mm/memtest: Add ARCH\_USE\_MEMTEST

- From: Anshuman Khandual \<hidden\>
- Date: 2021-02-08 03:17:40 
- List: linux-arm-kernel
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2021/02/6261841
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-mm/2021/02/6259509/t.md

```text


On 2/5/21 2:50 PM, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Hi Anshuman,
> 
> On 2/5/21 4:10 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> early_memtest() does not get called from all architectures. Hence enabling
>> CONFIG_MEMTEST and providing a valid memtest=[1..N] kernel command line
>> option might not trigger the memory pattern tests as would be expected in
>> normal circumstances. This situation is misleading.
> 
> Documentation already mentions which architectures support that:
> 
> memtest=        [KNL,X86,ARM,PPC] Enable memtest
> 
> yet I admit that not all reflected there

But there is nothing that prevents CONFIG_MEMTEST from being set on
other platforms that do not have an affect, which is not optimal.

> 
>>
>> The change here prevents the above mentioned problem after introducing a
>> new config option ARCH_USE_MEMTEST that should be subscribed on platforms
>> that call early_memtest(), in order to enable the config CONFIG_MEMTEST.
>> Conversely CONFIG_MEMTEST cannot be enabled on platforms where it would
>> not be tested anyway.
>>
> 
> Is that generic pattern? What about other cross arch parameters? Do they already
> use similar subscription or they rely on documentation?

Depending solely on the documentation should not be sufficient.

> 
> I'm not against the patch just want to check if things are consistent...
Not sure about other similar situations but those if present should
get fixed as well.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
```