[GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

6 messages, 3 authors, 2021-01-22 · open the first message on its own page

[GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

From: <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Date: 2021-01-22 14:42:40

From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Arnd, Olof,

I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I
didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm
missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very
predictable during all those years!

Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi
platform kernels.

I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5
that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in
linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by
mid-next-week.
Tell me if you see a problem with this approach.

Thanks, best regards,

The following changes since commit 5c8fe583cce542aa0b84adc939ce85293de36e5e:

  Linux 5.11-rc1 (2020-12-27 15:30:22 -0800)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux.git tags/at91-soc-5.12

for you to fetch changes up to 960ddf70cc11024e6e9dac206316d0160e00a77d:

  drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs (2020-12-28 17:58:20 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
AT91 SoC for 5.12

 - Only call atmel/soc.c driver on AT91 platforms

----------------------------------------------------------------
Sudeep Holla (1):
      drivers: soc: atmel: Avoid calling at91_soc_init on non AT91 SoCs

 drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

-- 
Nicolas Ferre

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-22 15:27:35

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Arnd, Olof,

I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I
didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm
missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very
predictable during all those years!

Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi
platform kernels.

I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5
that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in
linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by
mid-next-week.
Tell me if you see a problem with this approach.
This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request
into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines.

I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like,
I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there.

       Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Date: 2021-01-22 16:20:55

On 22/01/2021 at 16:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Arnd, Olof,

I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I
didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm
missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very
predictable during all those years!

Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi
platform kernels.

I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5
that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in
linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by
mid-next-week.
Tell me if you see a problem with this approach.
This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request
into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines.

I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like,
I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there.
Oh yes, that'd be good, indeed.

You can add the following tag:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.12+

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Date: 2021-01-22 17:31:37

On 22/01/2021 at 17:35, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

On 22/01/2021 16:25:47+0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Arnd, Olof,

I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I
didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm
missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very
predictable during all those years!

Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi
platform kernels.

I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5
that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in
linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by
mid-next-week.
Tell me if you see a problem with this approach.
This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request
into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines.

I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like,
I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there.
I wouldn't backport it as a fix, this is just a warning, in a
configuration that is very unlikely to be used (and honestly, I
wouldn't enable this driver on any platform).

If you take it as a fix, you'll have to also get
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1611318097-8970-5-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com/
Arnd, Alexandre,

Whatever you prefer is fine with me. As I'm not the first impacted I 
wouldn't push in one direction or another.

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Date: 2021-01-22 17:31:48

On 22/01/2021 16:25:47+0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Arnd, Olof,

I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I
didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm
missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very
predictable during all those years!

Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi
platform kernels.

I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5
that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in
linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by
mid-next-week.
Tell me if you see a problem with this approach.
This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request
into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines.

I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like,
I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there.
I wouldn't backport it as a fix, this is just a warning, in a
configuration that is very unlikely to be used (and honestly, I
wouldn't enable this driver on any platform).

If you take it as a fix, you'll have to also get
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1611318097-8970-5-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com/


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-22 22:38:40

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:05 PM Nicolas Ferre
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 22/01/2021 at 17:35, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
quoted
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

I wouldn't backport it as a fix, this is just a warning, in a
configuration that is very unlikely to be used (and honestly, I
wouldn't enable this driver on any platform).

If you take it as a fix, you'll have to also get
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1611318097-8970-5-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com/
Arnd, Alexandre,

Whatever you prefer is fine with me. As I'm not the first impacted I
wouldn't push in one direction or another.
I've applied both patches to the fixes branch now. While it's only
a harmless warning, it is one that would show up for anyone that
runs a kernel with this driver built-in on a different machine, and
this could be fairly annoying.

        Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help