Re: [PATCH RFC v2 10/21] kasan: inline random_tag for HW_TAGS
From: Andrey Konovalov <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-30 15:48:39
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:08 PM Dmitry Vyukov [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:19 PM Andrey Konovalov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Using random_tag() currently results in a function call. Move its definition to mm/kasan/kasan.h and turn it into a static inline function for hardware tag-based mode to avoid uneeded function call. Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <redacted> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Iac5b2faf9a912900e16cca6834d621f5d4abf427 --- mm/kasan/hw_tags.c | 5 ----- mm/kasan/kasan.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)diff --git a/mm/kasan/hw_tags.c b/mm/kasan/hw_tags.c index c3a0e83b5e7a..4c24bfcfeff9 100644 --- a/mm/kasan/hw_tags.c +++ b/mm/kasan/hw_tags.c@@ -36,11 +36,6 @@ void kasan_unpoison_memory(const void *address, size_t size) round_up(size, KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE), get_tag(address)); } -u8 random_tag(void) -{ - return get_random_tag(); -} - bool check_invalid_free(void *addr) { u8 ptr_tag = get_tag(addr);diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.h b/mm/kasan/kasan.h index 0ccbb3c4c519..94ba15c2f860 100644 --- a/mm/kasan/kasan.h +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.h@@ -188,6 +188,12 @@ static inline bool addr_has_metadata(const void *addr) #endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC || CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS */ +#if defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS) +void print_tags(u8 addr_tag, const void *addr); +#else +static inline void print_tags(u8 addr_tag, const void *addr) { } +#endif + bool check_invalid_free(void *addr); void *find_first_bad_addr(void *addr, size_t size);@@ -223,23 +229,6 @@ static inline void quarantine_reduce(void) { } static inline void quarantine_remove_cache(struct kmem_cache *cache) { } #endif -#if defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS) - -void print_tags(u8 addr_tag, const void *addr); - -u8 random_tag(void); - -#else - -static inline void print_tags(u8 addr_tag, const void *addr) { } - -static inline u8 random_tag(void) -{ - return 0; -} - -#endif - #ifndef arch_kasan_set_tag static inline const void *arch_kasan_set_tag(const void *addr, u8 tag) {@@ -273,6 +262,20 @@ static inline const void *arch_kasan_set_tag(const void *addr, u8 tag) #define get_mem_tag(addr) arch_get_mem_tag(addr) #define set_mem_tag_range(addr, size, tag) arch_set_mem_tag_range((addr), (size), (tag)) +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS +u8 random_tag(void); +#elif defined(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS) +static inline u8 random_tag(void) +{ + return get_random_tag();What's the difference between random_tag() and get_random_tag()? Do we need both?
Not really. Will simplify this in the next version and give cleaner names. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel