Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 4 authors, 2020-09-29

Re: [v4,2/4] dt-binding: reset-controller: ti: add 'mediatek,infra-reset' to compatible

From: Suman Anna <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-09 16:44:14
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml

On 9/8/20 1:49 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:26 PM Suman Anna [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Rob,

On 8/26/20 6:09 AM, Crystal Guo wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 03:02 +0800, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:03:22AM +0800, Crystal Guo wrote:
quoted
The TI syscon reset controller provides a common reset management,
and is suitable for MTK SoCs. Add compatible 'mediatek,infra-reset',
which denotes to use ti reset-controller driver directly.

Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt
index ab041032339b..5a0e9365b51b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Required properties:
                        "ti,k2l-pscrst"
                        "ti,k2hk-pscrst"
                        "ti,syscon-reset"
+                       "mediatek,infra-reset", "ti,syscon-reset"
You need your own binding doc. If you can use the same driver then fine,
but that's a separate issue. There's also reset-simple driver if you
have just array of 32-bit registers with a bit per reset.

Don't repeat 'ti,reset-bits' either.
Do you mean I should add a Mediatek reset binding doc, although Mediatek
reuse the TI reset controller directly?
Hmm, how do you envision not repeating the same bits in a separate binding?
I mean 'ti,reset-bits' isn't really something that should have been in
DT in the first place, but rather implied by the compatible string.
Ok, should I be deprecating this and move this data to driver then?

I am assuming that is how you are envisioning the new Mediatek binding to be
atleast.

regards
Suman
quoted
Does it help if I convert this to YAML first without a ti, prefix in the file name?
No, I don't think this should be a shared binding. The driver may be
able to be shared, but that's independent from the binding.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help