Re: [v4,2/4] dt-binding: reset-controller: ti: add 'mediatek,infra-reset' to compatible
From: Suman Anna <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-09 16:44:14
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
On 9/8/20 1:49 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:26 PM Suman Anna [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Rob, On 8/26/20 6:09 AM, Crystal Guo wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 03:02 +0800, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:03:22AM +0800, Crystal Guo wrote:quoted
The TI syscon reset controller provides a common reset management, and is suitable for MTK SoCs. Add compatible 'mediatek,infra-reset', which denotes to use ti reset-controller driver directly. Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt index ab041032339b..5a0e9365b51b 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Required properties: "ti,k2l-pscrst" "ti,k2hk-pscrst" "ti,syscon-reset" + "mediatek,infra-reset", "ti,syscon-reset"You need your own binding doc. If you can use the same driver then fine, but that's a separate issue. There's also reset-simple driver if you have just array of 32-bit registers with a bit per reset. Don't repeat 'ti,reset-bits' either.Do you mean I should add a Mediatek reset binding doc, although Mediatek reuse the TI reset controller directly?Hmm, how do you envision not repeating the same bits in a separate binding?I mean 'ti,reset-bits' isn't really something that should have been in DT in the first place, but rather implied by the compatible string.
Ok, should I be deprecating this and move this data to driver then? I am assuming that is how you are envisioning the new Mediatek binding to be atleast. regards Suman
quoted
Does it help if I convert this to YAML first without a ti, prefix in the file name?No, I don't think this should be a shared binding. The driver may be able to be shared, but that's independent from the binding. Rob
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel