Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: fix Rockchip rk3399-evb bindings
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Date: 2020-03-01 00:02:11
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip, lkml
Hi Johan, Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2020, 14:28:36 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
Hi Robin, When I look at the review process of rk3399-evb.dts it is mentioned here: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/672327/quoted
quoted
+ model = "Rockchip RK3399 Evaluation Board"; + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-evb", "rockchip,rk3399", + "google,rk3399evb-rev2", google,rk3399evb-rev1", + "google,rk3399evb-rev0" ;can you check against which compatibles that coreboot really matches? As we said that the evb changed between rev1 and rev2, I would expect the compatible to be something like compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-evb", "google,rk3399evb-rev2", "rockchip,rk3399"; leaving out the rev1 and rev0The consensus in version 4 ends in what is shown in the dts file, so I changed it in rockchip.yaml. Things from the past maybe can better be explained by Heiko. Please advise if this patch needs to change and in what file.
Just get rid of the "google,rk3399evb-rev2" from the .dts please :-) .
(1) "rockchip,rk3399-evb", "rockchip,rk3399", "google,rk3399evb-rev2";
is just wrong for the reasons Robin explained, I guess that slipped
through review at the time.
(2) "google,rk3399evb-rev2" was a specific variant for Google I'm pretty
sure they'll have scraped all these boards directly after they had the
first actual rk3399-gru development devices
So I'm pretty sure the only rk3399-evbs in existence are the general ones.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel