Enable CONFIG_LBDAF, which is required by ext4 fs. This option could
handle both ext3 and ext4, with ext4 requires this option to be enabled,
otherwise the filesystem is mounted RO mode.
Since the LBDAF is enabled by default for 32-bit systems, simply
removing the current "not set" entry enables the support.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhizhikin <redacted>
---
arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ CONFIG_NEON=y CONFIG_OPROFILE=y CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y-# CONFIG_LBDAF is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set CONFIG_NET=y CONFIG_PACKET=y
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Hello Dinh,
Just a short ping on this patch - do yo think you can accept this
patch and have it merged? I'd like to know whether it is planned to be
integrated, as it might be beneficial for a lot of socfpga users...
Thanks a lot!
--
Regards,
Andrey.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrey Zhizhikin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
Enable CONFIG_LBDAF, which is required by ext4 fs. This option could
handle both ext3 and ext4, with ext4 requires this option to be enabled,
otherwise the filesystem is mounted RO mode.
Since the LBDAF is enabled by default for 32-bit systems, simply
removing the current "not set" entry enables the support.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Zhizhikin <redacted>
---
arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ CONFIG_NEON=y CONFIG_OPROFILE=y CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y-# CONFIG_LBDAF is not set # CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSG is not set CONFIG_NET=y CONFIG_PACKET=y--
Hello Dinh,
Just a short ping on this patch - do yo think you can accept this
patch and have it merged? I'd like to know whether it is planned to be
integrated, as it might be beneficial for a lot of socfpga users...
Thanks a lot!
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:07 PM Dinh Nguyen [off-list ref] wrote:
On 3/7/19 1:43 AM, Andrey Zhizhikin wrote:
quoted
Hello Dinh,
Just a short ping on this patch - do yo think you can accept this
patch and have it merged? I'd like to know whether it is planned to be
integrated, as it might be beneficial for a lot of socfpga users...
Thanks a lot!