[PATCH v9 10/10] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver
From: Jolly Shah <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-03 17:57:58
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Stephen,
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sboyd at kernel.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 12:49 PM To: ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org; dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com; gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; hkallweit1 at gmail.com; keescook at chromium.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; mark.rutland at arm.com; matt at codeblueprint.co.uk; mingo at kernel.org; mturquette at baylibre.com; robh+dt at kernel.org; sboyd at codeaurora.org; sudeep.holla at arm.com; Jolly Shah [off-list ref]; Michal Simek [off-list ref] Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org; Tejas Patel <redacted>; linux- kernel at vger.kernel.org; Rajan Vaja [off-list ref]; Shubhrajyoti Datta [off-list ref]; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 10/10] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driver Quoting Jolly Shah (2018-07-17 13:09:01)quoted
Hi Stephen, Thanks for the review,quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sboyd at kernel.org] Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2018 10:27 PM To: Jolly Shah <redacted>; ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org; dmitry.torokhov at gmail.com; gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; hkallweit1 at gmail.com; keescook at chromium.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; mark.rutland at arm.com; matt at codeblueprint.co.uk; Michal Simek [off-list ref]; mingo at kernel.org; mturquette at baylibre.com; robh+dt at kernel.org; sboyd at codeaurora.org; sudeep.holla at arm.com Cc: Rajan Vaja <redacted>; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; Jolly Shah [off-list ref]; Tejas Patel [off-list ref]; Shubhrajyoti Datta [off-list ref]; Jolly Shah [off-list ref] Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/10] drivers: clk: Add ZynqMP clock driverquoted
+/** + * zynqmp_pm_clock_get_parents() - Get the first 3 parents of +clock for givenidquoted
+ * @clock_id: Clock ID + * @index: Parent index + * @parents: 3 parents of the given clock + * + * This function is used to get 3 parents for the clock specified +by + * given clock ID. + * + * This API will return 3 parents with a single response. To get + * other parents, master should call same API in loop with new + * parent index till error is returned. E.g First call should +have + * index 0 which will return parents 0,1 and 2. Next call, index + * should be 3 which will return parent 3,4 and 5 and so on. + * + * Return: Returns status, either success or error+reason */ +static int zynqmp_pm_clock_get_parents(u32 clock_id, u32 index, +u32*parents)quoted
+{ + struct zynqmp_pm_query_data qdata = {0}; + u32 ret_payload[PAYLOAD_ARG_CNT];What's the endianness of this payload? Is it little endian? Or do the eemi_ops convert to CPU native endianness?Its little endianIs it CPU native? This might need to be marked as __le32 for proper endianess code.
Fixed in v11 series(posted today).
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ +/** + * zynqmp_clock_init() - Initialize zynqmp clocks + * + * Return: 0 on success else error code */ static int __init +zynqmp_clock_init(void) { + int ret; + struct device_node *np; + + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "xlnx,zynqmp"); + if (!np) + return -ENOENT; + of_node_put(np); + + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, + "xlnx,zynqmp-clk");Why can't this be a platform device driver?Platform driver may probe later(an actually probing later in our case). This willresults in clock get failure in clock consumer peripherals. So clock registration needs to be done earlier. That's fine though? If a clk_get() fails because the provider isn't registered yet the consumer will see -EPROBE_DEFER and try again later.
You are right. Replaced init with platform driver probe in v11 series(posted today). Thanks, Jolly Shah