On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 06:27:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 25 July 2018 at 16:43, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:03:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 06:46:35PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

quoted

Hi,

On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:02:50 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

Replace GPL license statement with SPDX license identifier (GPL-2.0+).

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
---
 include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h | 12 +-----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h
index 0646500bca69..642e4e7f4084 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h

@@ -1,19 +1,9 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */

This code should be GPL-2.0 only, original license statement is most
likely result of using wrong file as the source of copy-paste. So I
would like to have the license fixed first before doing conversion to
SPDX.

If you think that's the case, then it makes sense and please go ahead.
As fair as I remember this required signed-off from all contributors...
so probably just Lukasz and Eduardo?

git blame shows just Lukasz so his Ack should be enough.

You probably want to have his ack yes.

quoted

I'm also fine with doing it in one patch like i.e. in commit a80ea4cb944e
("pata_bk3710: clarify license version and use SPDX header"), if you are
also fine with it could you please re-spin the patch (+Cc: Lukasz)?

I do not have interest in changing the license, I do not want to deal
with possible legal issues so I'll skip it.

:-)

I am fine however with abandoning this patch if you or someone else
sends license change + SPDX.

If that is the case, I am skipping this patch. Ping me / RESEND in case
you still want this. :-)

Best regards,
Krzysztof