[PATCH] dt-bindings: qspi: Add r8a7743/5 to the compatible list

Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rspi.txt | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rspi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rspi.txt
index 8f4169f..3b02b3a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rspi.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rspi.txt

@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@ Required properties:
 		     "renesas,rspi-<soctype>", "renesas,rspi" as fallback.
 		     For Renesas Serial Peripheral Interface on RZ/A1H:
 		     "renesas,rspi-<soctype>", "renesas,rspi-rz" as fallback.
-		     For Quad Serial Peripheral Interface on R-Car Gen2:
+		     For Quad Serial Peripheral Interface on R-Car Gen2 and
+		     RZ/G1 devices:
 		     "renesas,qspi-<soctype>", "renesas,qspi" as fallback.
 		     Examples with soctypes are:
 		        - "renesas,rspi-sh7757" (SH)
 			- "renesas,rspi-r7s72100" (RZ/A1H)
+			- "renesas,qspi-r8a7743" (RZ/G1M)
+			- "renesas,qspi-r8a7745" (RZ/G1E)
 			- "renesas,qspi-r8a7790" (R-Car H2)
 			- "renesas,qspi-r8a7791" (R-Car M2-W)
 			- "renesas,qspi-r8a7792" (R-Car V2H)

-- 
2.7.4

On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 09:07:15AM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:

Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rspi.txt | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Dear All,

this patch has been around for some time now, it was reviewed-by Geert Uytterhoeven and acked-by Rob Herring, any news?

Thanks,
Fab

Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered No. 04586709.

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 06:00:46PM +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote:

this patch has been around for some time now, it was reviewed-by Geert Uytterhoeven and acked-by Rob Herring, any news?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in
doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.

Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
patches.  Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are
doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're
doing.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20171117/502e4646/attachment.sig>