[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: amlogic: Add SoC information bindings
From: Neil Armstrong <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-09 13:58:41
Also in:
linux-amlogic, linux-devicetree, lkml
On 06/09/2017 03:37 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 11:45:38AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:quoted
Add bindings for the SoC information register of the Amlogic SoCs. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt index 5c01e65..ae3e8ed 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt@@ -60,3 +60,35 @@ Board compatible values (alphabetically, grouped by SoC): - "amlogic,q201" (Meson gxm s912) - "kingnovel,r-box-pro" (Meson gxm S912) - "nexbox,a1" (Meson gxm s912) + +Amlogic Meson Firmware registers Interface +------------------------------------------ + +The Meson SoCs have a register bank with status and data shared with the +secure firmware. + +Required properties: + - compatible: For Meson GX SoCs, must be "amlogic,meson-gx-ao-secure", "syscon", "simple-mfd" + +Sub-nodes should indentify components of this register interface : + +Meson GX SoC Information +------------------------ +A firmware register encodes the SoC type, package and revision information on +the Meson GX SoCs. +If present, a device node for this register should be added. + +Required properties: + - compatible: For Meson GX SoCs, must be "amlogic,meson-gx-chipid". + +Example +------- + +ao-secure at 140 { + compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-ao-secure", "syscon", "simple-mfd"; + reg = <0x0 0x140 0x0 0x140>; + + chipid { + compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-chipid";No registers for this block? If not, this node is pointless. "amlogic,meson-gx-ao-secure" should be specific enough to determine if you have this block or not and the driver for it can create a device if the OS needs it. Rob
Well OK, but since it's a firmware interface, it can be handy to list the possible capabilities, not especially tied to a driver. Neil