Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:

2017?2?22? 07:03? Maxime Ripard [off-list ref]???

quoted

Hi, 

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: 

quoted

Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the 
SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex. 

Add support for it. 

As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with 
knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source. 

Missing SoB. 

Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't? 

There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related
drivers RFC.

Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is
available now.

For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess --
so it's not RFC.

It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC
tags.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170223/c982a9c2/attachment.sig>

Hi Icenowy,

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Maxime Ripard
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:

quoted

2017?2?22? 07:03? Maxime Ripard [off-list ref]???

quoted

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:

quoted

Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the
SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex.

Add support for it.

As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with
knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source.

Missing SoB.

Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't?

There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related
drivers RFC.

Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is
available now.

For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess --
so it's not RFC.

It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC
tags.

Allwinner just released the docs today. See

    https://github.com/tinalinux/docs/tree/r40-v1.y

Could you check your patches against it, and maybe we don't need the
RFC tags anymore?

ChenYu