On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Quentin Schulz
[off-list ref] wrote:

On 05/01/2017 06:51, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Quentin Schulz
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

X-Powers AXP209 PMIC has multiple ADCs, each one exposing data from the
different power supplies connected to the PMIC.

This adds the ADC subnode for AXP20X PMIC.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/axp209.dtsi | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/axp209.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/axp209.dtsi
index 675bb0f..2a4e8ee 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/axp209.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/axp209.dtsi

@@ -53,6 +53,11 @@
        interrupt-controller;
        #interrupt-cells = <1>;

+       axp209_adc: axp209_adc {

Node name should be generic. Please change it to "adc".

OK, do I keep the label as is?

axp209_adc: adc {

Yup. The label is for dereferencing and stuff, and exists in a global scope.
You wouldn't want 2 label names clashing.

ChenYu

Thanks,
Quentin

--
Quentin Schulz, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com