Here is another spin. I could get my hands on an EVM and test the
changes on it as well. Doing so, I could also observe that 4bit ECC
on 8bits NANDS is currently broken in mailine. Apparently there had
already been some alerts on the mailing list some months ago.
[...]
quoted
Karl Beldan (4):
ARM: davinci: da8xx-dt: Add ti-aemif lookup for clock matching
ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: Enable AEMIF as a module
ARM: dts: da850,da850-evm: Add an aemif node and use it for the NAND
ARM: dts: da850-lcdk: Add NAND to DT
Tested on DA850-LCDK with UBIFS.
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
I forgot to mention that I had to enable:
CONFIG_UBIFS_FS=y
CONFIG_MTD_UBI=y
in order to test with ubifs. Care to send a patch adding these as
modules to davinci_all_defconfig?
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Karl Beldan <hidden> Date: 2016-08-19 13:46:02
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:15:59PM -0500, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Karl Beldan [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Here is another spin. I could get my hands on an EVM and test the
changes on it as well. Doing so, I could also observe that 4bit ECC
on 8bits NANDS is currently broken in mailine. Apparently there had
already been some alerts on the mailing list some months ago.
[...]
quoted
Karl Beldan (4):
ARM: davinci: da8xx-dt: Add ti-aemif lookup for clock matching
ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: Enable AEMIF as a module
ARM: dts: da850,da850-evm: Add an aemif node and use it for the NAND
ARM: dts: da850-lcdk: Add NAND to DT
Tested on DA850-LCDK with UBIFS.
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
I forgot to mention that I had to enable:
CONFIG_UBIFS_FS=y
CONFIG_MTD_UBI=y
in order to test with ubifs. Care to send a patch adding these as
modules to davinci_all_defconfig?
Sure, I'll add it to the series when resending.
Karl
From: Sekhar Nori <hidden> Date: 2016-08-19 14:10:35
On Friday 19 August 2016 07:16 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
Sure, I'll add it to the series when resending.
I just pushed an updated master branch on my tree with all the patches
accepted so far. Can you please rebase against that branch while sending?
Regards,
Sekhar
From: Karl Beldan <hidden> Date: 2016-08-19 17:42:38
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:40:35PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Friday 19 August 2016 07:16 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
quoted
Sure, I'll add it to the series when resending.
I just pushed an updated master branch on my tree with all the patches
accepted so far. Can you please rebase against that branch while sending?
I rebased and sent
[1] [PATCH] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: Enable some UBI modules
[2] [PATCH v2] ARM: davinci: da8xx-dt:
Add ti-aemif lookup for clock matching
Unfortunately while automating I messed up and sent both twice and [2] as
a reply to [1] while I intended to send them separately and preferably
[1] after [2].
You've already applied patches 2/4 and 3/4 of the original series
while 3/4 depends on [2] and 4/4 is on hold because of the ECC issue.
Please tell me if you want to deal with these patches or prefer a resend.
Regards,
Karl