DORMANTno replies

[PATCH 0003/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

From: Baole Ni <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-02 11:12:10
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: arm port, the rest · Maintainers: Russell King, Linus Torvalds

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lilly.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lilly.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lilly.c
index e9549a3..05e0312 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lilly.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lilly.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static struct platform_device *devices[] __initdata = {
 };
 
 static int mx31lilly_baseboard;
-core_param(mx31lilly_baseboard, mx31lilly_baseboard, int, 0444);
+core_param(mx31lilly_baseboard, mx31lilly_baseboard, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 static struct regulator_consumer_supply dummy_supplies[] = {
 	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdd33a", "smsc911x"),
-- 
2.9.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help