On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 20:13 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:43:57PM +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:

quoted

+static int mt2701_afe_i2s_set_clkdiv(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int div_id,
+				     int div)
+{

Why are we adding a set_clkdiv() operation?  I would expect the driver
to be able to figure things out automatically.

quoted

+	case DIV_ID_MCLK_TO_BCK:
+		afe_priv->i2s_path[i2s_num].div_mclk_to_bck = div;
+		break;
+	case DIV_ID_BCK_TO_LRCK:
+		afe_priv->i2s_path[i2s_num].div_bck_to_lrck = div;
+		break;

Especially in the case where we're configuring LRCLK, that's trivial
when we know the sample rate which we have to know anyway.

Oh... actually I want to say 'div_mclk_over_bck' and 'div_bck_over_lrck'
I'll fix the naming if we decide to reserve the set_clkdiv() operation.

For div_bck_over_lrck, yes we only support bck = 64fs now so I'll remove
it. Maybe in the future we'll allow bck = 32fs for some board and I'll
send patch on that time.

For div_mclk_over_bck, mt2635 can offer 128fs and 256fs mclk to codec,
and it depends on the board so I tend to let machine driver configure
it. However, maybe changing it to div_mclk_over_lrck will be better.
I'll do the change.

BTW, some patch is applied for the patchset so I need not to send the
new version but send another patchset, right?

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel