On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 13:45 +0800, Eddie Huang wrote:

On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 17:57 +0800, Joerg Roedel wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zhang at mediatek.com wrote:

quoted

From: Honghui Zhang <redacted>

Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701.

Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

Okay, I pushed my arm/mediatek branch to my tree at

	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu.git

Please base the patch on that branch and re-send.

I think it is better let Mediatek SoC maintainer Matthias to accept dtsi
patch like other drivers. This can avoid dtsi conflict. As I
remember,last time MT8173 IOMMU dtsi patch accepted in iommu tree and
mt8173.dtsi had conflict with arm soc tree at the merge window. Honghui
should resend this patch to Matthias, and elaborate your dependency with
clock and power domain dtsi, then Matthias know the merge sequence. 

Thanks, Eddie.

Hi, Joerg, 
This one is based on CCF "arm: dts: mt2701: Add clock controller device
nodes"[1] and power domain patch "Mediatek MT2701 SCPSYS power domain
support v7"[2],
But these two patchset are still being review now.

Do you think it's better that I send this one later after ccf and power
domain patch got merged, and let Matthias take it?


Thanks.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9109081
[2]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-May/005429.html

Eddie
Thanks