Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-20

[PATCH v2 10/11] phy: rockchip-emmc: Set phyctrl_frqsel based on card clock

From: dianders@chromium.org (Doug Anderson)
Date: 2016-06-20 16:49:52
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, linux-rockchip, lkml

Heiko,

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Heiko St?bner [off-list ref] wrote:
Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016, 16:04:34 schrieb Douglas Anderson:
quoted
The "phyctrl_frqsel" is described in the Arasan datasheet [1] as "the
frequency range of DLL operation".  Although the Rockchip variant of
this PHY has different ranges than the reference Arasan PHY it appears
as if the functionality is similar.  We should set this phyctrl field
properly.

Note: as per Rockchip engineers, apparently the "phyctrl_frqsel" is
actually only useful in HS200 / HS400 modes even though the DLL itself
it used for some purposes in all modes.  See the discussion in the
earlier change in this series: ("mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Always power the
PHY off/on when clock changes").  In any case, it shouldn't hurt to set
this always.

Note that this change should allow boards to run at HS200 / HS400 speed
modes while running at 100 MHz or 150 MHz.  In fact, running HS400 at
150 MHz (giving 300 MB/s) is the main motivation of this series, since
performance is still good but signal integrity problems are less
prevelant at 150 MHz.

[1]: https://arasan.com/wp-content/media/eMMC-5-1-Total-Solution_Rev-1-3.pdf

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Warn if we're more than 15 MHz from ideal rate (Shawn)
- Move code cleanup before set phyctrl_frqsel based on card clock (Shawn)
- Fix typo USB => SDHCI (Shawn)

 drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 82
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+),
13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c index 23fe50864526..51ddd543fd04 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
  * GNU General Public License for more details.
  */

+#include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -78,16 +79,73 @@
 struct rockchip_emmc_phy {
      unsigned int    reg_offset;
      struct regmap   *reg_base;
+     struct clk      *emmcclk;
 };

-static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct rockchip_emmc_phy *rk_phy,
-                                bool on_off)
+static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
 {
+     struct rockchip_emmc_phy *rk_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
      unsigned int caldone;
      unsigned int dllrdy;
+     unsigned int freqsel = PHYCTRL_FREQSEL_200M;
      unsigned long timeout;

      /*
+      * We purposely get the clock here and not in probe to avoid the
+      * circular dependency problem.  We expect:
+      * - PHY driver to probe
+      * - SDHCI driver to start probe
+      * - SDHCI driver to register it's clock
+      * - SDHCI driver to get the PHY
+      * - SDHCI driver to power on the PHY
+      */
Doesn't that leave open the unbind / removal case with that same circular
dependency? While true that the clock-framework does some special handling on
clk_unregister, I don't think this would catch multiple unbind/bind actions.

The emmc-phy would still hold on to the old clock-instance with the empty clk-
ops the ccf assigns, even when the rebind of the arasan-sdhci would create a
new clock.

How about using phy-init / phy-exit callbacks for that instead? (Aka clk_get
and clk_put the emmc clock in there instead of using the devm variant)
Using phy-init and phy-exit is perfect.  I'll spin shortly.
quoted
+     if (!rk_phy->emmcclk) {
+             rk_phy->emmcclk = devm_clk_get(&phy->dev, "emmcclk");
+
+             /* Don't expect defer at this point; try next time */
+             if (PTR_ERR(rk_phy->emmcclk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+                     dev_warn(&phy->dev, "Unexpected emmcclk defer\n");
+                     rk_phy->emmcclk = NULL;
+             }
+     }
+
+     if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rk_phy->emmcclk)) {
you just made it NULL in the error case above?
Yeah.  The idea was the if we happened to get a EPROBE_DEFER (should
never happen) we would continue on and just skip this part.  In any
case, should be a moot point with the new version, which I'll send out
soon.

-Doug
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help