[PATCH] arm64/mm: fix virtual address boundary check

Subsystems: arm64 port (aarch64 architecture), the rest

STALE3810d

3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-02-25 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] arm64/mm: fix virtual address boundary check

From: <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-24 16:02:35

From: Miles Chen <redacted>

The MODULES_VADDR is not the lowest possible
kernel virtual address. TASK_SIZE_64 may be larger than
MODULES_VADDR, FIXADDR_TOP, and PCI_IO_START.

Fix this by comparing TASK_SIZE_64 (highest user virtual address)
with VA_START (lowest kernel virtual address).

 #define VA_BITS		(CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS)
 #define VA_START		(UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << VA_BITS)
 #define PAGE_OFFSET		(UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << (VA_BITS - 1))
 #define MODULES_END		(PAGE_OFFSET)
 #define MODULES_VADDR		(MODULES_END - SZ_64M)
 #define PCI_IO_END		(MODULES_VADDR - SZ_2M)
 #define PCI_IO_START		(PCI_IO_END - PCI_IO_SIZE)
 #define FIXADDR_TOP		(PCI_IO_START - SZ_2M)
 #define TASK_SIZE_64		(UL(1) << VA_BITS)

Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index f3b061e..7d75697 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -343,8 +343,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_32			> TASK_SIZE_64);
 #endif
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_64			> MODULES_VADDR);
-	BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_64				> MODULES_VADDR);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_64			> VA_START);
+	BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_64				> VA_START);
 
 	if (PAGE_SIZE >= 16384 && get_num_physpages() <= 128) {
 		extern int sysctl_overcommit_memory;
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: fix virtual address boundary check

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: 2016-02-24 16:19:49

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:01:48AM +0800, miles.chen at mediatek.com wrote:
From: Miles Chen <redacted>

The MODULES_VADDR is not the lowest possible
kernel virtual address. TASK_SIZE_64 may be larger than
MODULES_VADDR, FIXADDR_TOP, and PCI_IO_START.

Fix this by comparing TASK_SIZE_64 (highest user virtual address)
with VA_START (lowest kernel virtual address).

 #define VA_BITS		(CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS)
 #define VA_START		(UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << VA_BITS)
 #define PAGE_OFFSET		(UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << (VA_BITS - 1))
 #define MODULES_END		(PAGE_OFFSET)
 #define MODULES_VADDR		(MODULES_END - SZ_64M)
 #define PCI_IO_END		(MODULES_VADDR - SZ_2M)
 #define PCI_IO_START		(PCI_IO_END - PCI_IO_SIZE)
 #define FIXADDR_TOP		(PCI_IO_START - SZ_2M)
 #define TASK_SIZE_64		(UL(1) << VA_BITS)
We should remove these checks altogether. There is a huge gap between
the user and kernel addresses that they would never overlap (we don't
have enough levels of page tables to cover 64-bit VA space).

-- 
Catalin

Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: fix virtual address boundary check

From: Miles Chen <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-25 01:34:40

On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:19 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:01:48AM +0800, miles.chen at mediatek.com wrote:
quoted
From: Miles Chen <redacted>

The MODULES_VADDR is not the lowest possible
kernel virtual address. TASK_SIZE_64 may be larger than
MODULES_VADDR, FIXADDR_TOP, and PCI_IO_START.

Fix this by comparing TASK_SIZE_64 (highest user virtual address)
with VA_START (lowest kernel virtual address).

 #define VA_BITS		(CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS)
 #define VA_START		(UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << VA_BITS)
 #define PAGE_OFFSET		(UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << (VA_BITS - 1))
 #define MODULES_END		(PAGE_OFFSET)
 #define MODULES_VADDR		(MODULES_END - SZ_64M)
 #define PCI_IO_END		(MODULES_VADDR - SZ_2M)
 #define PCI_IO_START		(PCI_IO_END - PCI_IO_SIZE)
 #define FIXADDR_TOP		(PCI_IO_START - SZ_2M)
 #define TASK_SIZE_64		(UL(1) << VA_BITS)
We should remove these checks altogether. There is a huge gap between
the user and kernel addresses that they would never overlap (we don't
have enough levels of page tables to cover 64-bit VA space).
Thanks for your reply. I confirmed that in the ARMv8 documentation. 
I'll send another patch to remove these checks.


Cheers,
Miles
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help