From: Tim Sander <hidden> Date: 2016-02-12 13:35:38
From: Tim Sander <redacted>
Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for respective board.
Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some board specific fixups
are not apropriate for board of the same platform ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5").
The same aproach is taken with the EBV-Socrates board.
Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Tim Sander <redacted>
Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for respective board.
Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some board specific fixups
are not apropriate for board of the same platform ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5").
The same aproach is taken with the EBV-Socrates board.
From: Tim Sander <hidden> Date: 2016-02-25 10:05:17
From: Tim Sander <redacted>
Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for respective board.
Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some board specific fixups are
not apropriate for board of the same platform ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5").
The same aproach is taken with the EBV-Socrates board.
Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hi Tim!
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Tim Sander <redacted>
Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for respective board.
Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some board specific fixups are
not apropriate for board of the same platform ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5").
The same aproach is taken with the EBV-Socrates board.
Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The naming of this board still confuses me though.
It has 3 different names now:
- de0_sockit.dts
- Terasic DE-0(Atlas)
- de0-nano-soc
And according to Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC is the same as Atlas-SoC with a different software?!
So all three names are actually correct ?! Weird.
Regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Hi Tim!
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
quoted
From: Tim Sander <redacted>
Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for respective board.
Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some board specific fixups are
not apropriate for board of the same platform ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5").
The same aproach is taken with the EBV-Socrates board.
Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The naming of this board still confuses me though.
It has 3 different names now:
- de0_sockit.dts
- Terasic DE-0(Atlas)
- de0-nano-soc
And according to Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC is the same as Atlas-SoC with a different software?!
So all three names are actually correct ?! Weird.
From: Tim Sander <hidden> Date: 2016-02-25 23:35:12
Hi Dinh
On Thursday 25 February 2016 10:56:28 Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 02/25/2016 04:38 AM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
quoted
Hi Tim!
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
quoted
From: Tim Sander <redacted>
Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for
respective board. Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some
board specific fixups are not apropriate for board of the same platform
("altr,socfpga-cyclone5"). The same aproach is taken with the
EBV-Socrates board.
Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ synology Synology, Inc. tbs TBS Technologies tcl Toby Churchill Ltd. technologic Technologic Systems+terasic Terasic Inc. thine THine Electronics, Inc. ti Texas Instruments tlm Trusted Logic Mobility
You should IMHO split this up in two patches.
First patch: add terasic
That's right. That patch will go through the DTS maintainer's tree.
Ah well for such a simple patch it turns out more complicated than thought :-)
Will do as soon as there is agreement on a name which does not seem that
easy...
The naming of this board still confuses me though.
It has 3 different names now:
- de0_sockit.dts
- Terasic DE-0(Atlas)
- de0-nano-soc
And according to Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC is the same as Atlas-SoC with a
different software?! So all three names are actually correct ?! Weird.
I had a hard time understanding this myself. But from what I gather
from[1], I just name the file de0_sockit.
As far as i remember there are different de0 and different sockit boards, so
the name does not seem to be as concise? I don't care but i would say that
de0-nano-soc is the most concise and easier to search for than atlas which
might turn up more false postives?
But as long as there is a more selective name than cyclone5 everthing is fine
with me.
Best regards
Tim
As far as i remember there are different de0 and different sockit boards, so
the name does not seem to be as concise? I don't care but i would say that
de0-nano-soc is the most concise and easier to search for than atlas which
might turn up more false postives?