Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice

Mark Brown [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:01:42PM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote:

quoted

The driver currently chooses between internal chip-select or gpio
based on the existence of the cs-gpios DT property which fails on
non-DT systems and also enforces the same choice for all devices.

Normally you shouldn't send incremental patches against patches that
have already been applied.

Should or shouldn't?

However in this case I'm going to drop your original patch anyway due
to the issue that was found so it's OK.

Sorry, I hadn't noticed it was already applied.  Too many trees to keep
track of.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:16:31PM +0000, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:

Mark Brown [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Normally you shouldn't send incremental patches against patches that
have already been applied.

Should or shouldn't?

Should, sorry.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160111/3a1187e0/attachment.sig>