[I repeat myself just in case my last message disappeared. It would be
 a shame if 4.4 was also regressed because of a missing response.]

I wrote:

Russell King wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:29:37PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:

quoted

Russell King wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:37:51PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:

quoted

I took both patches for a quick spin (a dozen boots and one hour 
uptime after that for each patch) and no incidents. I have not 
gathered data, but the crash on boot feels like it's quite a bit 
above 50% when there is a problem so this feels good (I used 5 
clean reboots when I bisected and that worked).

Reported-by: Peter Rosin <redacted>
Tested-by: Peter Rosin <redacted>

(and please don't forget to cc stable)

I've decided to do a more in-depth fix, so that we also solve the 
issue that when we schedule in these down_read()s, we don't leak 
the permissive domain register setting into the switched-to context.

Can you test this patch please?  Thanks.

Still looking good.

Does that mean I can add your reported and tested-by to this latest patch?

Right, I thought that was obvious, sorry for the confusion.

Reported-by: Peter Rosin <redacted>
Tested-by: Peter Rosin <redacted>

(and please don't forget to cc stable)

Cheers,
Peter