Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 4 authors, 2015-12-07

[PATCH V3 2/6] acpi: pci: Setup MSI domain for ACPI based pci devices

From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-22 11:36:08
Also in: linux-acpi, lkml

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:18:45 -0600
Suravee Suthikulpanit [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Marc,

On 11/19/15 06:08, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:47:25 -0700
Suravee Suthikulpanit [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Suravee,

Sorry it took so long to get to this series. Comments below.
No worry.
quoted
quoted
This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which returns
the MSI domain of the specified PCI host bridge with DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI
bus token. Then, it is assigned to pci device.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 13 +++++++++++++
  drivers/pci/probe.c    |  2 ++
  include/linux/pci.h    |  7 +++++++
  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
index a32ba75..0e21ef4 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@

  #include <linux/delay.h>
  #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
  #include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/msi.h>
  #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
  #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
@@ -689,6 +691,17 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
  	.cleanup = pci_acpi_cleanup,
  };

+struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+	struct irq_domain *dom = NULL;
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = pci_msi_get_fwnode(&bus->dev);
+
+	if (fwnode)
+		dom = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwnode,
+					       DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
+	return dom;
+}
+
Given this, I really question the need for what you define in patch #1
to be standalone. It is only used by ACPI (DT has its own private
helpers), and it is so far unlikely that it will be of any use for
other firmware interfaces.

My suggestion is to get rid of pci_msi_get_fwnode() and move the
registration helper into this file. That'd be much simpler.

Thanks,

	M.
Ok, I'll take care of this. I assume the rest of the patches looks ok.
I still need to finish going through it (I have minor comments so far
on some of the other patches), but I want to get the core ACPI stuff in
shape before doing anything else.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help