[PATCH v2 3/5] pci: altera: Add Altera PCIe MSI driver
From: Ley Foon Tan <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-03 10:37:36
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pci, lkml
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Marc Zyngier [off-list ref] wrote:
On 31/07/15 11:15, Ley Foon Tan wrote:quoted
This patch adds Altera PCIe MSI driver. This soft IP supports configurable number of vectors, which is a dts parameter.I've reviewed the initial drop of this code; basic courtesy would be to keep me CCed on the follow-up series.
Will keep you in CC for the following revision. Sorry about this.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <redacted> --- drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.c | 324 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 332 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.cdiff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig index 108500a..51d0468 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig@@ -153,4 +153,11 @@ config PCIE_ALTERA Say Y here if you want to enable PCIe controller support for Altera SoCFPGA family of SoCs. +config PCIE_ALTERA_MSI + bool "Altera PCIe MSI feature" + depends on PCI_MSI + help + Say Y here if you want PCIe MSI support for the Altera SocFPGA SoC. + This MSI driver supports Altera MSI to GIC controller IP. + endmenudiff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile index 6954f76..6c4913d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile@@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC) += pcie-iproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC_PLATFORM) += pcie-iproc-platform.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC_BCMA) += pcie-iproc-bcma.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ALTERA) += pcie-altera.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ALTERA_MSI) += pcie-altera-msi.odiff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6014719 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.c@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@ +/* + * Copyright Altera Corporation (C) 2013-2015. All rights reserved + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License, + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for + * more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with + * this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. + */ +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/msi.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_irq.h> +#include <linux/of_pci.h> +#include <linux/pci.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> + +#define MSI_STATUS 0x0 +#define MSI_ERROR 0x4 +#define MSI_INTMASK 0x8 + +#define MAX_MSI_VECTORS 32 +struct altera_msi { + DECLARE_BITMAP(used, MAX_MSI_VECTORS); + struct mutex lock; /* proctect used variable */ + struct platform_device *pdev; + struct irq_domain *msi_domain; + struct irq_domain *inner_domain; + void __iomem *csr_base; + void __iomem *vector_base; + phys_addr_t vector_phy; + u32 num_of_vectors; + int irq; +}; + +static inline void msi_writel(struct altera_msi *msi, u32 value, u32 reg) +{ + writel_relaxed(value, msi->csr_base + reg); +} + +static inline u32 msi_readl(struct altera_msi *msi, u32 reg) +{ + return readl_relaxed(msi->csr_base + reg); +} + +static void altera_msi_isr(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) +{ + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); + struct altera_msi *msi; + unsigned long status; + u32 num_of_vectors; + u32 bit; + + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); + msi = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); + num_of_vectors = msi->num_of_vectors; + + do { + status = msi_readl(msi, MSI_STATUS); + if (!status) + break; + + do { + bit = find_first_bit(&status, num_of_vectors); + /* Dummy read from vector to clear the interrupt */ + readl_relaxed(msi->vector_base + (bit * sizeof(u32))); + + irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->inner_domain, bit);Use of irq is a bit confusing, as this is a parameter describing the chaining interrupt. Consider using a different name for this variable.
Okay, will change it to 'virq'.
quoted
+ if (irq) { + if (test_bit(bit, msi->used)) + generic_handle_irq(irq); + else + dev_info(&msi->pdev->dev, "unhandled MSI\n"); + } else + dev_info(&msi->pdev->dev, "unexpected MSI\n");The whole statement could be rewritten as: if (irq && test_bit(bit, msi->used)) generic_handle_irq(irq); else dev_err(...); In all cases, this is a grave error, so dev_info is not appropriate here.
Noted.
quoted
+ + /* Clear the bit from status and repeat without reading + * again status register. */ + clear_bit(bit, &status);You don't need an atomic operation here, so __clear_bit() should be enough.
Noted.
quoted
+ } while (status); + } while (1); + + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); +} + +static struct irq_chip altera_msi_irq_chip = { + .name = "Altera PCIe MSI", + .irq_enable = pci_msi_unmask_irq, + .irq_disable = pci_msi_mask_irq, + .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, + .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, +}; + +static struct msi_domain_info altera_msi_domain_info = { + .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | + MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), + .chip = &altera_msi_irq_chip, +}; + +static void altera_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg) +{ + u32 mask; + struct altera_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); + u64 addr = msi->vector_phy + (data->hwirq * sizeof(u32));Use phys_addr_t.
Noted.
quoted
+ + msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(addr); + msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(addr); + msg->data = data->hwirq; + + mask = msi_readl(msi, MSI_INTMASK); + mask |= 1 << data->hwirq; + msi_writel(msi, mask, MSI_INTMASK);It feels a bit weird to unmask the interrupt when you compose the message. I'd expect this to be done in the mask/unmask methods.
Do you refer to these 2 callbacks? .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, How about we move this INTMASK code above to altera_irq_domain_alloc()? We have unmask code in altera_irq_domain_free() now.
quoted
+ dev_dbg(&msi->pdev->dev, "msi#%d address_lo 0x%x\n", (int)data->hwirq, + msg->address_lo);You may want to print the whole address here.
Noted.
quoted
+} + +static int altera_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, + const struct cpumask *mask, bool force) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + +static struct irq_chip altera_msi_bottom_irq_chip = { + .name = "Altera MSI", + .irq_compose_msi_msg = altera_compose_msi_msg, + .irq_set_affinity = altera_msi_set_affinity, +}; + +static int altera_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq, + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args) +{ + struct altera_msi *msi = domain->host_data; + int bit; + + mutex_lock(&msi->lock); + + bit = find_first_zero_bit(msi->used, msi->num_of_vectors); + if (bit < msi->num_of_vectors) + set_bit(bit, msi->used); + + mutex_unlock(&msi->lock); + + if (bit < 0) + return bit;How can "bit" be negative here? find_first_zero_bit returns an unsigned long... You probably want to change the type of "bit" to reflect that.
Okay, will change to "unsigned long" type.
quoted
+ else if (bit >= msi->num_of_vectors)Useless "else" anyway.
I think we still need to check for failing case, if we don't have
available unused bit.
This could be rewritten as below:
bit = find_first_zero_bit(msi->used, msi->num_of_vectors);
if (bit < msi->num_of_vectors)
set_bit(bit, msi->used);
else
return -ENOSPC;
quoted
+ return -ENOSPC; + + irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, bit, &altera_msi_bottom_irq_chip, + domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq, + NULL, NULL); + set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID); + + return 0; +} + +static void altera_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, + unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs) +{ + struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq); + struct altera_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + u32 mask; + + mutex_lock(&msi->lock); + + if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, msi->used)) + dev_err(&msi->pdev->dev, "trying to free unused MSI#%lu\n", + d->hwirq);Put this statement in { } so that it matches the "else" construct.
Noted.
quoted
+ else { + clear_bit(d->hwirq, msi->used);No need for an atomic operation here, you own the mutex.
Okay, change to __clear_bit.
quoted
+ mask = msi_readl(msi, MSI_INTMASK); + mask &= ~(1 << d->hwirq); + msi_writel(msi, mask, MSI_INTMASK); + } + + mutex_unlock(&msi->lock); +} + +static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = { + .alloc = altera_irq_domain_alloc, + .free = altera_irq_domain_free, +}; + +static int altera_allocate_domains(struct altera_msi *msi) +{ + msi->inner_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, msi->num_of_vectors, + &msi_domain_ops, msi); + if (!msi->inner_domain) { + dev_err(&msi->pdev->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + msi->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain( + msi->pdev->dev.of_node,Please put at least one argument to the function on the same line. This is otherwise very hard to read.
Okay.
quoted
+ &altera_msi_domain_info, msi->inner_domain); + if (!msi->msi_domain) { + dev_err(&msi->pdev->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n"); + irq_domain_remove(msi->inner_domain); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + return 0; +} + +static void altera_free_domains(struct altera_msi *msi) +{ + irq_domain_remove(msi->msi_domain); + irq_domain_remove(msi->inner_domain); +} + + +static int altera_msi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct altera_msi *msi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + msi_writel(msi, 0, MSI_INTMASK); + irq_set_chained_handler(msi->irq, NULL); + irq_set_handler_data(msi->irq, NULL); + + altera_free_domains(msi); + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); + return 0; +} + +int altera_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)Make this static.
Okay.
quoted
+{ + struct altera_msi *msi; + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; + struct resource *res; + int ret; + + msi = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct altera_msi), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!msi) + return -ENOMEM; + + mutex_init(&msi->lock); + msi->pdev = pdev; + + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "csr"); + msi->csr_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(msi->csr_base)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get csr resource failed\n"); + return PTR_ERR(msi->csr_base); + } + + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, + "vector_slave"); + msi->vector_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(msi->vector_base)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get vector slave resource failed\n"); + return PTR_ERR(msi->vector_base); + } + + msi->vector_phy = res->start; + + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "num-vectors", &msi->num_of_vectors)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to parse the number of vectors\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + ret = altera_allocate_domains(msi); + if (ret) + return ret; + + msi->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + if (msi->irq <= 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to map IRQ: %d\n", msi->irq); + ret = -ENODEV; + goto err; + } + + irq_set_chained_handler(msi->irq, altera_msi_isr); + ret = irq_set_handler_data(msi->irq, msi);Use irq_set_chained_handler_and_data.
Okay.
quoted
+ if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register IRQ handler: %d\n", + ret); + goto err; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, msi); + + return 0; + +err: + altera_msi_remove(pdev); + return ret; +} + +static const struct of_device_id altera_msi_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "altr,msi-1.0", NULL }, + { }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, altera_msi_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver altera_msi_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "altera-msi", + .owner = THIS_MODULE,Remove this .owner assignment, the core code deals with it.
Okay.
quoted
+ .of_match_table = altera_msi_of_match, + }, + .probe = altera_msi_probe, + .remove = altera_msi_remove, +}; + +static int __init altera_msi_init(void) +{ + return platform_driver_register(&altera_msi_driver); +} + +subsys_initcall(altera_msi_init);Hmmm. if you're initializing this as part of the core kernel, it will never be a module. What is the point of the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE above?
Okay, will remove MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE. Thanks for reviewing. Regards Ley Foon