# \[RFC PATCH 14/15\] regulator: pwm: implement -\>enable(), -\>disable() and -\>is\_enabled methods

- From: Boris Brezillon \<hidden\>
- Date: 2015-07-14 11:16:28 
- List: linux-arm-kernel
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2015/07/8716864
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-arm-kernel/2015/07/8716021/t.md

```text
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:08:19 +0100
Mark Brown [ref] wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Mark Brown [ref] wrote:
> 
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > Implement the ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods and remove
> > > > the PWM call in ->set_voltage_sel().
> 
> > > This doesn't apply, please check and resend.
> 
> > This series was made on top of Linus' tree (4.2-rc1 IIRC) and patch 14
> > and 15 were not meant to be applied without Thierry's approval (they
> > depend on other changes in the PWM framework).
> > I can rebase them on top of linux-next (or just on top of Linus'
> > 4.2-rc2) if Thierry is okay with that, but I don't think rebasing them
> > on your regulator's for-next branch is a good idea.
> 
> What is the dependency for the enable patch?

Oh, indeed. This patch has no dependency on the PWM changes. I'll send
it on its own then.

Thanks,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
```