Thread (46 messages) 46 messages, 9 authors, 2015-07-17

[PATCH 13/13] driver-core: probe dependencies before probing

From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
Date: 2015-06-17 18:18:09
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 03:42:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Before actually probing a device, find out what dependencies it has and
do our best to ensure that they are available at this point.
This is accomplished by finding out what platform devices need to be
probed so the dependencies are available.
...and then trying to probe them first.
If any dependencies are still unavailable after that (most probably a
missing driver or an error in the HW description from the firmware), we
print a nice error message so that people don't have to add a zillion of
printks to find out why a device asked for its probe to be deferred.
So, I think I like this approach though I've not done a full pass
through and I'm not sure how expensive it gets (there's definitely room
for optimisation as the patch notes).  I'm not 100% sure I see what
prints this error message you're referring to (I'm just seeing debug
prints).
+static struct fwnode_handle *get_enclosing_platform_dev(
+						struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
Only platform devices?
+static void check_dependencies_per_class(struct class *class, void *data)
+{
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = data;
+	struct list_head *deps;
+	struct fwnode_dependency *dep, *tmp;
+
+	if (!class->get_dependencies)
+		return;
+
+	deps = class->get_dependencies(fwnode);
+	if (!deps)
+		return;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp, deps, dependency) {
+		if (!check_dependency(dep->fwnode))
+			pr_debug("Dependency '%s' not available\n",
+				 fwnode_get_name(dep->fwnode));
+
+		list_del(&dep->dependency);
+		kfree(dep);
+	}
+
+	kfree(deps);
OK, so the caller is responsible for freeing everything and the class
must allocate - this definitely suggests that 

I'm not sure there's any benefit in having deps be dynamically allocated
here, just put it on the stack and iterate through the list - the
iteration is going to be cheap if we get nothing back (probably the
common case) and probably cheaper than the alloc/free.

One thing here is that I was under the impression classes were supposed
to be going away...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150617/2865540c/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help