Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 4 authors, 2014-11-20
STALE4219d

[PATCH 5/5] PCI: Rip out pci_bus_add_devices() from pci_scan_root_bus()

From: Liviu Dudau <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-19 19:03:17
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-mips, linux-pci, linux-sh, sparclinux

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:11:41PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 15:32:49 Yijing Wang wrote:
quoted
Just like pci_scan_bus(), we also should rip out
pci_bus_add_devices() from pci_scan_root_bus().
Lots platforms first call pci_scan_root_bus(), but
after that, they call pci_bus_size_bridges() and
pci_bus_assign_resources(). Place pci_bus_add_devices()
in pci_scan_root_bus() hurts PCI scan logic.
I think we really need to wait for Bjorn to comment on this patch,
as I mentioned the idea behind pci_scan_root_bus() was to integrate
the scanning part, which you now undo, though I can still see this
working out in the long run.
quoted
Should no functional change.
But you are moving the pci_bus_add_devices() later in a couple of
places. While this seems entirely reasonable, I would consider
it a functional change.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/pci.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/pci.c
index 076c35c..97f9730 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/pci.c
@@ -334,6 +334,8 @@ common_init_pci(void)
 
 		bus = pci_scan_root_bus(NULL, next_busno, alpha_mv.pci_ops,
 					hose, &resources);
+		if (bus)
+			pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
 		hose->bus = bus;
 		hose->need_domain_info = need_domain_info;
 		next_busno = bus->busn_res.end + 1;
How about making pci_bus_add_devices() handle a NULL argument to save
the if() here and elsewhere?
Actually, I would stop there if the bus is NULL and start cleaning up. If not,
things are going to blow up three lines down when next_busno is calculated.

Best regards,
Liviu

quoted
diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci.c
index 1bf60b1..f083688 100644
--- a/arch/mips/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static void pcibios_scanbus(struct pci_controller *hose)
 		if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
 			pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
 			pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
+			pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
 		}
 	}
 }
This one looks wrong, I think you still want to call pci_bus_add_devices()
even with PCI_PROBE_ONLY set.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c b/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
index 1f80a88..007466e 100644
--- a/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
@@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ int __init pcibios_init(void)
 			pci_add_resource(&resources, &iomem_resource);
 			bus = pci_scan_root_bus(NULL, 0, controller->ops,
 						controller, &resources);
+			if (bus)
+				pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
 			controller->root_bus = bus;
 			controller->last_busno = bus->busn_res.end;
 		}
Should the pci_bus_add_devices come after setting the bus numbers here?

	Arnd
-- 
-------------------
   .oooO
   (   )
    \ (  Oooo.
     \_) (   )
          ) /
         (_/

 One small step
   for me ...
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help