[PATCH] ARM: kbuild: Fix forced rebuild after 'make dtbs'
From: Jason Cooper <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-26 00:57:27
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:51:50PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:41:35PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:quoted
Dne 2.11.2014 v 21:52 Jason Cooper napsal(a):quoted
After this patch: f4d4ffc03efc kbuild: dtbs_install: new make target was added the kernel tree, Linus Walleij noticed that 'make dtbs' forced a following 'make zImage' to rebuild the entire tree, even though nothing had changed. His report: After this patch a while back I have observed the following behaviour of the kernel build: make zImage make zImage -> incremental build, just relink make zImage make dtbs make zImage -> The whole kernel gets rebuilt So now if I happen to recompile my device trees, I suddenly want the entire zImage to be rebuilt to? It's by definition not changes that affect the kernel build :-( I noticed this because my build scripts calls make dtbs && make zImage, and started to rebuild absolutely everything all the time. To fix this, we make only the dtbs_install target depend on the prepare target. It's needed to make sure KERNELVERSION is calculated prior to installing.If a mere 'make prepare' causes a rebuild of the whole kernel, then there is something fishy in the ARM Makefiles. However, if you only need the KERNELRELEASE variable, then you do not need to depend on prepare. The main Makefile makes sure that silentoldconfig is ran and therefore KERNELRELEASE set for all targets except make *config.Running make prepare and then re-running a build doesn't rebuild anything for me. However, I always build with O= Also works if I do a make dtbs too. So, everything seems to work as expected here. I think this needs a bit more debugging to see why the whole kernel is being rebuilt - the kernel build system has methods to tell you why stuff is being built, which would be a good place to start.
Linus, since you were the one experiencing the regression, care to take a whack at that? thx, Jason.