[PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs

[PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-06-26
[PATCH 1/3] Documentation: devicetree: Update samsung UART bindings · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-06-26
[PATCH 2/3] serial: samsung: Consider DT alias when probing ports · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-06-26
[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: SAMSUNG: Add aliases of UART nodes · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-06-26
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2014-06-26
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-06-26
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs · Daniel Drake <hidden> · 2014-07-08
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-07-08
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs · One Thousand Gnomes <hidden> · 2014-07-09
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Deterministic UART numbering on Samsung SoCs · Daniel Drake <hidden> · 2014-07-23

From: One Thousand Gnomes <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-09 13:24:51
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, linux-serial, lkml

I like the sound of going to the standard ttyS notation and only
providing ports for ones that exist, but is this userspace-visible

ttyS is 8250 compatible UARTS.

If the Samsung is not an 8250 compatible UART then it doesn't belong as
ttyS from the kernel perspective.

How your udev handles it is up to you.

Alan

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help