My guess is we aren't going to have a 2 digit cpuid here any time soon
but the static checkers don't know that and complain that the snprintf()
could overflow.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
index ed49b25fa552..a6ee6d7cd63f 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
mevt = container_of(evt, struct mct_clock_event_device, evt);
mevt->base = EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(cpu);
- sprintf(mevt->name, "mct_tick%d", cpu);
+ snprintf(mevt->name, sizeof(mevt->name), "mct_tick%d", cpu);
evt->name = mevt->name;
evt->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);