[PATCH] spi: davinci: Fix the build warning with CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y

With CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y spi driver throws below warning

drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c: In function ?davinci_spi_probe?:
drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c:965:3: warning: format ?%d? expects argument of type ?int?, but argument 3 has type ?resource_size_t? [-Wformat]
drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c:965:3: warning: format ?%d? expects argument of type ?int?, but argument 4 has type ?resource_size_t? [-Wformat]

Lets use '%pa' to properly print 'resource_size_t' type variables.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <redacted>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c b/drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c
index 8fbfe24..c91ad94 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-davinci.c

@@ -962,8 +962,8 @@ static int davinci_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto free_clk;
 
 		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "DMA: supported\n");
-		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "DMA: RX channel: %d, TX channel: %d, "
-				"event queue: %d\n", dma_rx_chan, dma_tx_chan,
+		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "DMA: RX channel: %pa, TX channel: %pa, "
+				"event queue: %d\n", &dma_rx_chan, &dma_tx_chan,
 				pdata->dma_event_q);
 	}
 

-- 
1.7.9.5

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:52:59PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:

With CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y spi driver throws below warning

Applied, thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131001/c9966945/attachment.sig>

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:52:59PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:

quoted

With CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y spi driver throws below warning

Applied, thanks.

These warnings are showing up (again?), so wherever it was applied is
not making it into -next. Did it fall between the cracks?


-Olof

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:38:13PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Applied, thanks.

These warnings are showing up (again?), so wherever it was applied is
not making it into -next. Did it fall between the cracks?

Looks lie it never got pushed and nobody looked at the warnings for over
a month.  Oh well, sorry about that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131113/1d7b541a/attachment.sig>

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:29:52PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:38:13PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

Applied, thanks.

quoted

These warnings are showing up (again?), so wherever it was applied is
not making it into -next. Did it fall between the cracks?

Looks lie it never got pushed and nobody looked at the warnings for over
a month.  Oh well, sorry about that.

No worries.

I've been eyeing the warnings but not doing anything about it. Didn't
notice that there was a patch until I started looking for existing
patches to take care of it (and post patches where needed).


-Olof

Mark,

On Wednesday 13 November 2013 08:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:38:13PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

Applied, thanks.

quoted

These warnings are showing up (again?), so wherever it was applied is
not making it into -next. Did it fall between the cracks?

Looks lie it never got pushed and nobody looked at the warnings for over
a month.  Oh well, sorry about that.

Are you going to push this one ? The warning is still showing up at
3.13-rc1.

Regards,
Santosh 

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 04:17:24PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:

On Wednesday 13 November 2013 08:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

Looks lie it never got pushed and nobody looked at the warnings for over
a month.  Oh well, sorry about that.

Are you going to push this one ? The warning is still showing up at
3.13-rc1.

It's a warning fix only so no, I was going to leave it till the next
merge window.  It'll appear in -next as soon as Linus releases -rc1.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131124/32bd6646/attachment.sig>