[PATCH] arm64: wire in generic parport.h

The arm64 port doesn't provide a parport.h which causes a build failure
with some configurations:

  drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:67:25: fatal error: asm/parport.h: No such file or directory
   #include <asm/parport.h>

This patch wires in the generic parport.h for arm64.

Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild
index 79a642d..487b0a2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild

@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ generic-y += local64.h
 generic-y += mman.h
 generic-y += msgbuf.h
 generic-y += mutex.h
+generic-y += parport.h                                                                                         
 generic-y += pci.h
 generic-y += percpu.h
 generic-y += poll.h

-- 
1.8.1.4

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Mark Salter [off-list ref] wrote:

The arm64 port doesn't provide a parport.h which causes a build failure
with some configurations:

  drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:67:25: fatal error: asm/parport.h: No such file or directory
   #include <asm/parport.h>

This patch wires in the generic parport.h for arm64.

Can arm64 have a PC-style parport?

If not, you're better off disabling it in drivers/parport/Kconfig.

You will receive bonus points for introducing ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT,
cfr. ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 22:25 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Mark Salter [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The arm64 port doesn't provide a parport.h which causes a build failure
with some configurations:

  drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:67:25: fatal error: asm/parport.h: No such file or directory
   #include <asm/parport.h>

This patch wires in the generic parport.h for arm64.

Can arm64 have a PC-style parport?

Good question. I'm not sure, but really doubt it.

If not, you're better off disabling it in drivers/parport/Kconfig.

You will receive bonus points for introducing ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT,
cfr. ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC.

Yes, good point. I'll work up a new patch. I can use some bonus points.

--Mark

On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 22:25 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Mark Salter [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The arm64 port doesn't provide a parport.h which causes a build failure
with some configurations:

  drivers/parport/parport_pc.c:67:25: fatal error: asm/parport.h: No such file or directory
   #include <asm/parport.h>

This patch wires in the generic parport.h for arm64.

Can arm64 have a PC-style parport?

If not, you're better off disabling it in drivers/parport/Kconfig.

You will receive bonus points for introducing ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT,
cfr. ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_FDC.

Okay, I have two versions of the patch. One which follows the PC_FDC
patch and adds something like this to arch/<somearch>/Kconfig:

config ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
	def_bool y


The other version adds:

config ARCH_MAY_HAVE_PC_PARPORT
	bool

to arch/Kconfig (or maybe that should be in drivers/parport/Kconfig) so
that the various arches just need to select it.

Is there any preference for one over the other?

--Mark