Enable arm_global_timer for Zynq brakes boot
From: Daniel Lezcano <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-31 20:49:08
Also in:
lkml
On 07/31/2013 12:34 AM, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:47:15AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:quoted
On 07/30/2013 02:03 AM, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:quoted
Hi Daniel, On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 02:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: (snip)quoted
the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag tells the cpuidle framework the local timer will be stopped when entering to the idle state. In this case, the cpuidle framework will call clockevents_notify(ENTER) and switches to a broadcast timer and will call clockevents_notify(EXIT) when exiting the idle state, switching the local timer back in use.I've been thinking about this, trying to understand how this makes my boot attempts on Zynq hang. IIUC, the wrongly provided TIMER_STOP flag would make the timer core switch to a broadcast device even though it wouldn't be necessary. But shouldn't it still work? It sounds like we do something useless, but nothing wrong in a sense that it should result in breakage. I guess I'm missing something obvious. This timer system will always remain a mystery to me. Actually this more or less leads to the question: What is this 'broadcast timer'. I guess that is some clockevent device which is common to all cores? (that would be the cadence_ttc for Zynq). Is the hang pointing to some issue with that driver?If you look at the /proc/timer_list, which timer is used for broadcasting ?So, the correct run results (full output attached). The vanilla kernel uses the twd timers as local timers and the TTC as broadcast device: Tick Device: mode: 1 Broadcast device Clock Event Device: ttc_clockevent When I remove the offending CPUIDLE flag and add the DT fragment to enable the global timer, the twd timers are still used as local timers and the broadcast device is the global timer: Tick Device: mode: 1 Broadcast device Clock Event Device: arm_global_timer Again, since boot hangs in the actually broken case, I don't see way to obtain this information for that case.
Can't you use the maxcpus=1 option to ensure the system to boot up ? -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog