Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2013-07-31

[PATCH v2] ARM: EDMA: Fix clearing of unused list for DT DMA resources

From: Sekhar Nori <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-30 16:29:43
Also in: linux-mmc, linux-omap, lkml

On 7/30/2013 9:17 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/edma.c b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
index a432e6c..765d578 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/edma.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
quoted
quoted
+	} else {
+		for (; i < pdev->num_resources; i++) {
+			if ((pdev->resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_DMA) &&
+			    (int)pdev->resource[i].start >= 0) {
+				ctlr = EDMA_CTLR(pdev->resource[i].start);
+				clear_bit(EDMA_CHAN_SLOT(
+					  pdev->resource[i].start),
+					  edma_cc[ctlr]->edma_unused);
+			}
So there is very little in common between OF and non-OF versions of this
function. Why not have two different versions of this function for the
two cases? The OF version can reside under the CONFIG_OF conditional
already in use in the file. This will also save you the ugly line breaks
you had to resort to due to too deep indentation.
Actually those line breaks are not necessary and wouldn't result in
compilation errors. I was planning to drop them. I'll go ahead and split
it out anyway, now that also the OF version of the function is going to
be bit longer if we use the of_parse functions.

Thanks for your review,
It turns out, I gave a bad idea. What I suggested will break the case of
non-DT boot with CONFIG_OF enabled. So what you had was fine. May be
just return from "if (dev->of_node)" so you don't need to have an else
block and can save on the indentation.

Thanks,
Sekhar
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help