Hi,

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Unrelated to this: The mach/id.h removal seems to have caused a few
build errors in the for-next tree with u8500_defconfig. Can you have
a look at what went wrong there?

Yes ... hm.

I have no clue how this happened, somehow new dependencues
have appeared and I've somehow had a config that builds without
some of the drivers or something :-(

Or I built the wrong branch and thought it was clear to go.

Shall we just drop it until I've fixed it up?

What's the expected timeline for fixup? I can revert the patch in
for-next and we can take a fix on top of the branch that introduced
the breakage, if that's easier.


-Olof