On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:52:05PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:

[CC'ing more people & lists.]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:36:46AM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:

quoted

Whats up with commits 0e87e73f4abe1ada69cf780fe2550c6361a1b53b and
b4b87a934c30fb91cbdd18ae028acdc361e1cf0f. As far as I can tell,
dma_request_slave_channel_compat() does not exist in 3.9 as of
52caa59ed335616c5254adff7911465a57ed9f14, nor does it exist in
linux-next as of Feb 26. Am I just being dense ?

Yeah, order got a little messed up.  The problem is known and the
sub-thread talking about it starts about here:

	http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg225241.html

with the conclusion (AFAICT) that Vinod is to push it:

	http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg226062.html

quoted

Reverting those 2 commits at least allows the compile complete.

When the dependencies are sorted out, will you revert the revert
or do I need to do something?

Yes we had agreed that I will send it.

I have applied this one now, and will send second PULL request to Linus soon.

Arnd,
The second patch of dw_dmac you wnated to send me fails to apply for me. Can you
either rebase or send with your updates with my ack?

Either ways let me know
--
~Vinod