linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

7 messages, 5 authors, 2012-12-07 · open the first message on its own page

linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-04 04:42:20

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c between commit 298ea44f211d ("ARM:
OMAP4: hwmod data: ipu and dsp to use parent clocks instead of leaf
clocks") from the iommu tree and commit 13a5b6228679 ("ARM: OMAP44xx:
clock: drop obsolete clock data") from the arm-soc tree.

I just deleted the file as the latter did and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121204/3c83aa90/attachment.sig>

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Date: 2012-12-04 11:07:03

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:42:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c between commit 298ea44f211d ("ARM:
OMAP4: hwmod data: ipu and dsp to use parent clocks instead of leaf
clocks") from the iommu tree and commit 13a5b6228679 ("ARM: OMAP44xx:
clock: drop obsolete clock data") from the arm-soc tree.

I just deleted the file as the latter did and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).
Ohad, Omar, any comment on this?


	Joerg

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-04 11:10:40

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Joerg Roedel [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:42:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c between commit 298ea44f211d ("ARM:
OMAP4: hwmod data: ipu and dsp to use parent clocks instead of leaf
clocks") from the iommu tree and commit 13a5b6228679 ("ARM: OMAP44xx:
clock: drop obsolete clock data") from the arm-soc tree.

I just deleted the file as the latter did and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).
Ohad, Omar, any comment on this?
I'd prefer Omar or Paul to have a look here. Looping in Tony as well.

Ohad.

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

From: Omar Ramirez Luna <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-06 23:16:06

Hi All,

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Joerg Roedel [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:42:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c between commit 298ea44f211d ("ARM:
OMAP4: hwmod data: ipu and dsp to use parent clocks instead of leaf
clocks") from the iommu tree and commit 13a5b6228679 ("ARM: OMAP44xx:
clock: drop obsolete clock data") from the arm-soc tree.

I just deleted the file as the latter did and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).
Ohad, Omar, any comment on this?
I'd prefer Omar or Paul to have a look here. Looping in Tony as well.
I have checked next-20121206, it's OK to delete that file as the patch
from Paul is doing that for common clock framework migration; now the
only missing hunk from my original patch should apply to
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c which is the file that now has
ipu_fck and dsp_fck (unused) clocks, I can send a patch to remove them
through linux-omap tree.

Cheers,

Omar

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Date: 2012-12-07 00:59:14

Hi Omar,

On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
I have checked next-20121206, it's OK to delete that file as the patch
from Paul is doing that for common clock framework migration; now the
only missing hunk from my original patch should apply to
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c which is the file that now has
ipu_fck and dsp_fck (unused) clocks, I can send a patch to remove them
through linux-omap tree.
OK, will you add the mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c changes in the same 
patch?


- Paul

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

From: Omar Ramirez Luna <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-07 01:39:13

Hi Paul,

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Paul Walmsley [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Omar,

On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
quoted
I have checked next-20121206, it's OK to delete that file as the patch
from Paul is doing that for common clock framework migration; now the
only missing hunk from my original patch should apply to
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c which is the file that now has
ipu_fck and dsp_fck (unused) clocks, I can send a patch to remove them
through linux-omap tree.
OK, will you add the mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c changes in the same
patch?
I was planning to wait until linux-omap had the changes from iommu
tree (probably at rc1), if the merge conflict resulted in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c still having ipu and dsp clocks,
in this case the hwmod data changes wouldn't be needed in the patch.

Cheers,

Omar

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree

From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Date: 2012-12-07 01:40:24

On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
I was planning to wait until linux-omap had the changes from iommu
tree (probably at rc1), if the merge conflict resulted in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c still having ipu and dsp clocks,
in this case the hwmod data changes wouldn't be needed in the patch.
OK makes sense.

- Paul
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help