From: Shubhrajyoti D <hidden> Date: 2012-11-06 09:54:33
Currently we just queue the transfer and release the
qos constraints, however we donot wait for the transfer
to complete to release the constraint. Move the remove
constraint after the bus busy as we are sure that the
transfers are completed by then.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <redacted>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Jean Pihet <hidden> Date: 2012-11-06 16:24:34
Hi Shubhrajyoti,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Shubhrajyoti D [off-list ref] wrote:
Currently we just queue the transfer and release the
qos constraints, however we donot wait for the transfer
to complete to release the constraint. Move the remove
constraint after the bus busy as we are sure that the
transfers are completed by then.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <redacted>
Good catch, the change definitely makes sense. Feel free to add:
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <redacted>
Thanks,
Jean.
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Wolfram Sang <hidden> Date: 2012-11-14 10:57:34
quoted
Currently we just queue the transfer and release the
qos constraints, however we donot wait for the transfer
to complete to release the constraint. Move the remove
constraint after the bus busy as we are sure that the
transfers are completed by then.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <redacted>
Good catch, the change definitely makes sense. Feel free to add:
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <redacted>
From: Jean Pihet <hidden> Date: 2012-11-14 11:03:35
Hi Wolfram, Shubhrajyoti,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Currently we just queue the transfer and release the
qos constraints, however we donot wait for the transfer
to complete to release the constraint. Move the remove
constraint after the bus busy as we are sure that the
transfers are completed by then.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <redacted>
Good catch, the change definitely makes sense. Feel free to add:
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <redacted>
Since I just reverted the QoS patch, I suppose this gets merged into the
original patch when resent?
The best for now is to re-submit a new patch that moves the constraint
release in the original code. Later the PM QoS patch will be applied
on the new code base.
What do you think? I can provide a patch if needed.
Regards,
Jean
On Wednesday 14 November 2012 04:33 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
quoted
quoted
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <redacted>
Since I just reverted the QoS patch, I suppose this gets merged into the
original patch when resent?
The best for now is to re-submit a new patch that moves the constraint
release in the original code. Later the PM QoS patch will be applied
on the new code base.
What do you think? I can provide a patch if needed.