Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Documentation: add description of DT binding for the gpio-mvebu driver

3 messages, 3 authors, 2012-09-14 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Documentation: add description of DT binding for the gpio-mvebu driver

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-14 13:17:09

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/13/2012 03:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
quoted
Dear Rob Herring,

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:20:54 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On 09/13/2012 10:54 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <redacted>
Cc: Grant Likely <redacted>
Cc: Linus Walleij <redacted>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Jason Cooper <redacted>
Cc: Gregory Clement <redacted>
---
Grant is pretty much offline right now.
Yes, I know, but MAINTAINERS does not mention an alternate maintainer
for the GPIO subsystem. Who is the interim maintainer that will
ultimately have to ack/nack those patches?
Linus W. is.
I stated Reviewed-by: on the GPIO patch, please merge it through the
Marvell tree (I guess that's the plan?)

Acked-by: on the rest FWIW, I'm no ARM SoC nor DT maintainer...

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Documentation: add description of DT binding for the gpio-mvebu driver

From: Thomas Petazzoni <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-14 14:54:08

Dear Linus Walleij,

On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:17:09 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted
quoted
Yes, I know, but MAINTAINERS does not mention an alternate maintainer
for the GPIO subsystem. Who is the interim maintainer that will
ultimately have to ack/nack those patches?
Linus W. is.
I stated Reviewed-by: on the GPIO patch, please merge it through the
Marvell tree (I guess that's the plan?)
Yes, I guess it's the easiest plan (Jason ? Andrew ?). We however need
Acks on the pinctrl patch series as well, since this one depends on it.

Thanks a lot for your review!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Documentation: add description of DT binding for the gpio-mvebu driver

From: Jason Cooper <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-14 23:46:03

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 04:54:08PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Linus Walleij,

On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:17:09 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Yes, I know, but MAINTAINERS does not mention an alternate maintainer
for the GPIO subsystem. Who is the interim maintainer that will
ultimately have to ack/nack those patches?
Linus W. is.
I stated Reviewed-by: on the GPIO patch, please merge it through the
Marvell tree (I guess that's the plan?)
Yes, I guess it's the easiest plan (Jason ? Andrew ?). We however need
Acks on the pinctrl patch series as well, since this one depends on it.
Yes, that's the plan.  I'm currently waiting for my previous series of
pull requests to get pulled before I start pulling in anything else.

thx,

Jason.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help