linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree

2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-09-25 · open the first message on its own page

linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-25 06:37:34

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-uhci.txt between commit
100d45970327 ("ARM: vt8500: Add support for UHCI companion controller")
from the usb tree and commit 95e9fd10f06c ("arm: vt8500: doc: Add device
tree bindings for arch-vt8500 devices") from the arm-soc tree.

I used the version from the arm-soc tree and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120925/92e733c1/attachment.sig>

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree

From: Tony Prisk <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-25 07:16:58

On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:37 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/platform-uhci.txt between commit
100d45970327 ("ARM: vt8500: Add support for UHCI companion controller")
from the usb tree and commit 95e9fd10f06c ("arm: vt8500: doc: Add device
tree bindings for arch-vt8500 devices") from the arm-soc tree.

I used the version from the arm-soc tree and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).
Both versions were the same (my bad for not removing it from the arm-soc
patch).
Thanks Stephen

Regards

Tony P
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help