[PATCH V4 0/2] arm: samsung: Move FIMD headers to include/video/

[PATCH V4 0/2] arm: samsung: Move FIMD headers to include/video/ · Leela Krishna Amudala <hidden> · 2012-08-07
[PATCH V4 1/2] include/video: move fimd register headers from platform to include/video · Leela Krishna Amudala <hidden> · 2012-08-07
[PATCH V4 1/2] include/video: move fimd register headers from platform to include/video · arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) · 2012-08-07
[PATCH V4 1/2] include/video: move fimd register headers from platform to include/video · arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) · 2012-08-07
[PATCH V4 2/2] include/video: Add register offsets for FIMD version 8 · Leela Krishna Amudala <hidden> · 2012-08-07
[PATCH V4 0/2] arm: samsung: Move FIMD headers to include/video/ · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-08-07
[PATCH V4 0/2] arm: samsung: Move FIMD headers to include/video/ · s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) · 2012-08-07
[PATCH V4 0/2] arm: samsung: Move FIMD headers to include/video/ · Kukjin Kim <hidden> · 2012-08-08

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-07 14:33:42
Also in: dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-samsung-soc

On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:04:30PM +0530, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:

 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h    |  159 --------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c           |    2 +-
 drivers/video/s3c-fb.c                             |    2 +-
 .../plat/regs-fb.h => include/video/samsung_fimd.h |  152 +++++++++++++++++--

Isn't include/video for framebuffer drivers?  Isn't this more a DRM thing?
Wouldn't include/drm therefore be more appropriate?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help