Hi All,
I am doing a below call in my driver to get the virtual address
equivalent to physical address 0x0.
pdata->v_addr = ioremap(pdata->p_addr, PAGE_SIZE); /* pdata->p_addr=0 */
Above call returns me a valid virtual address i.e: 0xfa200000. After
that when i try to access the address i am getting a kernel panic like
below.
[ 59.498141] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
fa200000
[ 59.498141] pgd = d4f80000
[ 59.498141] [fa200000] *pgd=00000000
[ 59.498141] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
[ 59.498141] Modules linked in:
[ 59.498141] CPU: 0 Tainted: G W
(3.4.0-g3b5f728-00009-g638207a #13)
[ 59.498141] PC is at msm_pm_config_rst_vector_before_pc+0x8/0x30
[ 59.498141] LR is at msm_pm_boot_config_before_pc+0x18/0x20
[ 59.498141] pc : [<c0078f84>] lr : [<c007903c>] psr: a0000093
[ 59.498141] sp : c0837ef0 ip : cfe00000 fp : 0000000d
[ 59.498141] r10: da7efc17 r9 : 225c4278 r8 : 00000006
[ 59.498141] r7 : 0003c000 r6 : c085c824 r5 : 00000001 r4 : fa101000
[ 59.498141] r3 : fa200000 r2 : c095080c r1 : 002250fc r0 : 00000000
[ 59.498141] Flags: NzCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM
Segment kernel
[ 59.498141] Control: 10c5387d Table: 25180059 DAC: 00000015
[ 59.498141] [<c0078f84>]
(msm_pm_config_rst_vector_before_pc+0x8/0x30) from [<c007903c>]
(msm_pm_boot_config_before_pc+0x18/0x20)
[ 59.498141] [<c007903c>] (msm_pm_boot_config_before_pc+0x18/0x20)
from [<c007a55c>] (msm_pm_power_collapse+0x410/0xb04)
[ 59.498141] [<c007a55c>] (msm_pm_power_collapse+0x410/0xb04) from
[<c007b17c>] (arch_idle+0x294/0x3e0)
[ 59.498141] [<c007b17c>] (arch_idle+0x294/0x3e0) from [<c000eed8>]
(default_idle+0x18/0x2c)
[ 59.498141] [<c000eed8>] (default_idle+0x18/0x2c) from [<c000f254>]
(cpu_idle+0x90/0xe4)
[ 59.498141] [<c000f254>] (cpu_idle+0x90/0xe4) from [<c057231c>]
(rest_init+0x88/0xa0)
[ 59.498141] [<c057231c>] (rest_init+0x88/0xa0) from [<c07ff890>]
(start_kernel+0x3a8/0x40c)
[ 59.498141] Code: c0704256 e12fff1e e59f2020 e5923000 (e5930000)
I am observing the crash on 3.4 but not on the 3.0 kernel.I check the
"arch/arch/mm/ioremap.c" code changes between 3.0 and 3.4. I came across
few changes that are uploaded by "Nicolas Pitre" and few fixes made by
RMK and Pawel Moll.
I don't see a crash after i commented out the below code in
__arm_ioremap_pfn_caller().
read_lock()
---
loop
---
read_unlock()
Here i am pasting a few extra logs that i have added into "ioremap.c" &
"mmu.c" file.
[ 0.000000] memory pool 3 (start 2a300000 size 3800000) initialized
[ 0.000000] Memory policy: ECC disabled, Data cache writeback
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa100000 size=0x1000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa101000 size=0x1000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa000000 size=0x1000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa102000 size=0x1000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa103000 size=0x1000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa010000 size=0x1000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa900000 size=0xd00000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa400000 size=0x100000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa701000 size=0x1000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa300000 size=0x100000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa200000 size=0x100000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa500000 size=0x100000
[ 0.000000] vm_area_add_early: called with addr=fa800000 size=0x100000
...
...
...
[ 0.161784] ioremap: pfn=0x0 phys=0x0 offset=0x0 size=0x1000
[ 0.161813] ioremap: area da0fbdc0: phys_addr=0xc0100000 pfn=0xc0100
size=0x1000
[ 0.161838] ioremap: area da0fbe20: phys_addr=0xa8600000 pfn=0xa8600
size=0x1000
[ 0.161861] ioremap: area da0fbd80: phys_addr=0xc0000000 pfn=0xc0000
size=0x1000
[ 0.161886] ioremap: area da0fbda0: phys_addr=0xc0100000 pfn=0xc0100
size=0x1000
[ 0.161909] ioremap: area da0fbde0: phys_addr=0xa9200000 pfn=0xa9200
size=0x1000
[ 0.161933] ioremap: area da0fbe00: phys_addr=0xa9300000 pfn=0xa9300
size=0x1000
[ 0.161956] ioremap: area da0fbd40: phys_addr=0x0 pfn=0x0 size=0x100000
[ 0.161979] ioremap: found: addr fa200000 => 0xfa200000 => 0xfa200000
[ 0.161999] *** reset_vector = 0xfa200000
Can someone know me what is wrong in ioremap call?
Why i am not seeing a crash after i commented out the loop above?
Thanks,
Murali N
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
From: Laura Abbott <hidden> Date: 2012-08-21 17:23:52
On 8/21/2012 7:28 AM, Murali Nalajala wrote:
Hi All,
I am doing a below call in my driver to get the virtual address
equivalent to physical address 0x0.
pdata->v_addr = ioremap(pdata->p_addr, PAGE_SIZE); /* pdata->p_addr=0 */
Above call returns me a valid virtual address i.e: 0xfa200000. After
that when i try to access the address i am getting a kernel panic like
below.
<snip>
[ 0.161784] ioremap: pfn=0x0 phys=0x0 offset=0x0 size=0x1000
[ 0.161813] ioremap: area da0fbdc0: phys_addr=0xc0100000 pfn=0xc0100
size=0x1000
[ 0.161838] ioremap: area da0fbe20: phys_addr=0xa8600000 pfn=0xa8600
size=0x1000
[ 0.161861] ioremap: area da0fbd80: phys_addr=0xc0000000 pfn=0xc0000
size=0x1000
[ 0.161886] ioremap: area da0fbda0: phys_addr=0xc0100000 pfn=0xc0100
size=0x1000
[ 0.161909] ioremap: area da0fbde0: phys_addr=0xa9200000 pfn=0xa9200
size=0x1000
[ 0.161933] ioremap: area da0fbe00: phys_addr=0xa9300000 pfn=0xa9300
size=0x1000
[ 0.161956] ioremap: area da0fbd40: phys_addr=0x0 pfn=0x0 size=0x100000
[ 0.161979] ioremap: found: addr fa200000 => 0xfa200000 => 0xfa200000
[ 0.161999] *** reset_vector = 0xfa200000
Can someone know me what is wrong in ioremap call?
Why i am not seeing a crash after i commented out the loop above?
Looks like you are hitting the empty section gap:
0xfa200000-0xfa300000 1048576 pmd_empty_section_gap+0x0/0x3c ioremap
pmd_empty_section_gap ends up with vm->phys_addr = 0x0 because it was
never set. This section isn't actually mapped so when searching for the
range in the static io map it finds this address and returns it but it
isn't actually a valid address to return. Perhaps ioremap should not
bother trying to re-use the static iomap if the address is zero and let
pmd_empty_section_gap use 0x0 as a dummy value?
long pfn,
*/
read_lock(&vmlist_lock);
for (area = vmlist; area; area = area->next) {
- if (!size || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 && pfn >= 0x100000))
+ if (!size || !pfn || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 &&
+ pfn >= 0x100000))
break;
if (!(area->flags & VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING))
continue;
Thanks,
Murali N
Thanks,
Laura
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
Hi All,
I am doing a below call in my driver to get the virtual address
equivalent to physical address 0x0.
pdata->v_addr = ioremap(pdata->p_addr, PAGE_SIZE); /* pdata->p_addr=0 */
Above call returns me a valid virtual address i.e: 0xfa200000. After
that when i try to access the address i am getting a kernel panic like
below.
<snip>
quoted
[ 0.161784] ioremap: pfn=0x0 phys=0x0 offset=0x0 size=0x1000
[ 0.161813] ioremap: area da0fbdc0: phys_addr=0xc0100000 pfn=0xc0100
size=0x1000
[ 0.161838] ioremap: area da0fbe20: phys_addr=0xa8600000 pfn=0xa8600
size=0x1000
[ 0.161861] ioremap: area da0fbd80: phys_addr=0xc0000000 pfn=0xc0000
size=0x1000
[ 0.161886] ioremap: area da0fbda0: phys_addr=0xc0100000 pfn=0xc0100
size=0x1000
[ 0.161909] ioremap: area da0fbde0: phys_addr=0xa9200000 pfn=0xa9200
size=0x1000
[ 0.161933] ioremap: area da0fbe00: phys_addr=0xa9300000 pfn=0xa9300
size=0x1000
[ 0.161956] ioremap: area da0fbd40: phys_addr=0x0 pfn=0x0 size=0x100000
[ 0.161979] ioremap: found: addr fa200000 => 0xfa200000 => 0xfa200000
[ 0.161999] *** reset_vector = 0xfa200000
Can someone know me what is wrong in ioremap call?
Why i am not seeing a crash after i commented out the loop above?
Looks like you are hitting the empty section gap:
0xfa200000-0xfa300000 1048576 pmd_empty_section_gap+0x0/0x3c ioremap
pmd_empty_section_gap ends up with vm->phys_addr = 0x0 because it was
never set. This section isn't actually mapped so when searching for the
range in the static io map it finds this address and returns it but it
isn't actually a valid address to return. Perhaps ioremap should not
bother trying to re-use the static iomap if the address is zero and let
pmd_empty_section_gap use 0x0 as a dummy value?
long pfn,
*/
read_lock(&vmlist_lock);
for (area = vmlist; area; area = area->next) {
- if (!size || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 && pfn >= 0x100000))
+ if (!size || !pfn || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 &&
+ pfn >= 0x100000))
break;
if (!(area->flags & VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING))
continue;
quoted
Thanks,
Murali N
Thanks,
Laura
Hi Nicolas,
Laura's code helps me to resolve the issue. But not sure of side effects
of this change and other implications.
If the above changes are ok, can you please provide the ack.
Thanks,
Murali N
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
From: Trilok Soni <hidden> Date: 2012-08-22 06:46:14
Hi Laura,
On 8/21/2012 10:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
quoted hunk
Looks like you are hitting the empty section gap:
0xfa200000-0xfa300000 1048576 pmd_empty_section_gap+0x0/0x3c ioremap
pmd_empty_section_gap ends up with vm->phys_addr = 0x0 because it was
never set. This section isn't actually mapped so when searching for the
range in the static io map it finds this address and returns it but it
isn't actually a valid address to return. Perhaps ioremap should not
bother trying to re-use the static iomap if the address is zero and let
pmd_empty_section_gap use 0x0 as a dummy value?
long pfn,
*/
read_lock(&vmlist_lock);
for (area = vmlist; area; area = area->next) {
- if (!size || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 && pfn >= 0x100000))
+ if (!size || !pfn || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 &&
+ pfn >= 0x100000))
Thanks for the patch, but how about just checking pmd_none on such
addresses and since there won't be any mapping created for such gaps? We
need to check if this is fine for all, since I remember that Nico
added these functions for the OMAP boot issue I guess.
---Trilok Soni
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> Date: 2012-08-22 09:53:15
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:16:08PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
Thanks for the patch, but how about just checking pmd_none on such
addresses and since there won't be any mapping created for such gaps? We
need to check if this is fine for all, since I remember that Nico
added these functions for the OMAP boot issue I guess.
A better solution would be as below - this requires no changes to the
existing ioremap code, we just mark these differently.
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static void __init pmd_empty_section_gap(unsigned long addr)vm=early_alloc_aligned(sizeof(*vm),__alignof__(*vm));vm->addr=(void*)addr;vm->size=SECTION_SIZE;-vm->flags=VM_IOREMAP|VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING;+vm->flags=VM_IOREMAP|VM_ARM_EMPTY_MAPPING;vm->caller=pmd_empty_section_gap;vm_area_add_early(vm);}
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void __init fill_pmd_gaps(void)/* we're still single threaded hence no lock needed here */for(vm=vmlist;vm;vm=vm->next){-if(!(vm->flags&VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING))+if(!(vm->flags&(VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING|VM_ARM_EMPTY_MAPPING))continue;addr=(unsignedlong)vm->addr;if(addr<next)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> Date: 2012-08-22 11:23:52
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted hunk
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void __init fill_pmd_gaps(void) /* we're still single threaded hence no lock needed here */ for (vm = vmlist; vm; vm = vm->next) {- if (!(vm->flags & VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING))+ if (!(vm->flags & (VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING | VM_ARM_EMPTY_MAPPING))
Not forgetting the additional close paren needed here...
On 8/22/2012 3:23 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted hunk
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:16:08PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote:
quoted
Thanks for the patch, but how about just checking pmd_none on such
addresses and since there won't be any mapping created for such gaps? We
need to check if this is fine for all, since I remember that Nico
added these functions for the OMAP boot issue I guess.
A better solution would be as below - this requires no changes to the
existing ioremap code, we just mark these differently.
@@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ static void __init pmd_empty_section_gap(unsigned long addr)vm=early_alloc_aligned(sizeof(*vm),__alignof__(*vm));vm->addr=(void*)addr;vm->size=SECTION_SIZE;-vm->flags=VM_IOREMAP|VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING;+vm->flags=VM_IOREMAP|VM_ARM_EMPTY_MAPPING;vm->caller=pmd_empty_section_gap;vm_area_add_early(vm);}
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void __init fill_pmd_gaps(void)/* we're still single threaded hence no lock needed here */for(vm=vmlist;vm;vm=vm->next){-if(!(vm->flags&VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING))+if(!(vm->flags&(VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING|VM_ARM_EMPTY_MAPPING))continue;addr=(unsignedlong)vm->addr;if(addr<next)
Tested on MSM platform
Tested-by: Murali Nalajala <redacted>
Thanks,
Murali N
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden> Date: 2012-08-22 13:19:04
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void __init fill_pmd_gaps(void) /* we're still single threaded hence no lock needed here */ for (vm = vmlist; vm; vm = vm->next) {- if (!(vm->flags & VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING))+ if (!(vm->flags & (VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING | VM_ARM_EMPTY_MAPPING))
Not forgetting the additional close paren needed here...