From: Tushar Behera <hidden> Date: 2012-08-29 04:48:52
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
The patches are rebased on top of v3.6-rc3.
Tushar Behera (2):
ARM: EXYNOS: Set the capability of pdm0 and pdm1 as DMA_PRIVATE
DMA: PL330: Set the capability of pdm0 and pdm1 as DMA_PRIVATE
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c | 2 ++
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
--
1.7.4.1
From: Tushar Behera <hidden> Date: 2012-08-29 04:48:57
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
CC: Kukjin Kim <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <redacted>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
From: Tushar Behera <hidden> Date: 2012-08-29 04:49:01
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
CC: Vinod Koul <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <redacted>
---
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 10:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
The patches are rebased on top of v3.6-rc3.
Kukjin, if you ack them I can take thru my tree, other way round is fine
with me too.
Tushar Behera (2):
ARM: EXYNOS: Set the capability of pdm0 and pdm1 as DMA_PRIVATE
DMA: PL330: Set the capability of pdm0 and pdm1 as DMA_PRIVATE
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c | 2 ++
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
From: Kukjin Kim <hidden> Date: 2012-09-07 05:30:57
Vinod Koul wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 10:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
quoted
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
The patches are rebased on top of v3.6-rc3.
Kukjin, if you ack them I can take thru my tree, other way round is fine
with me too.
Hi Vinod,
Looks good to me, please pick them into your tree with my ack.
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <redacted>
If any problems, please kindly let me know.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim [off-list ref], Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
quoted
Tushar Behera (2):
ARM: EXYNOS: Set the capability of pdm0 and pdm1 as DMA_PRIVATE
DMA: PL330: Set the capability of pdm0 and pdm1 as DMA_PRIVATE
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c | 2 ++
drivers/dma/pl330.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 14:30 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Vinod Koul wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 10:16 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
quoted
DMA clients pdma0 and pdma1 are internal to the SoC and are used only
by dedicated peripherals. Since they cannot be used for generic
purpose, their capability should be set as DMA_PRIVATE.
The patches are rebased on top of v3.6-rc3.
Kukjin, if you ack them I can take thru my tree, other way round is fine
with me too.
Hi Vinod,
Looks good to me, please pick them into your tree with my ack.
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <redacted>