[PATCH v3 12/32] PCI/ARM: use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify implementation

From: Jiang Liu <redacted>

Use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify PCIe ARM implementation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c |   13 ++-----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c
index 0e09137..5f99d33 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c

@@ -367,17 +367,8 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0bf1, tegra_pcie_fixup_class);
 /* Tegra PCIE requires relaxed ordering */
 static void __devinit tegra_pcie_relax_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	u16 val16;
-	int pos = pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
-
-	if (pos <= 0) {
-		dev_err(&dev->dev, "skipping relaxed ordering fixup\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &val16);
-	val16 |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN;
-	pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, val16);
+	pci_pcie_capability_change_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
+					PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN, 0);
 }
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, tegra_pcie_relax_enable);
 

-- 
1.7.9.5

On 08/01/2012 09:54 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:

From: Jiang Liu <redacted>

Use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify PCIe ARM implementation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <redacted>

This is probably fine from my perspective assuming the underlying PCI
API implementation is OKd by relevant people.

Thierry, can you comment on whether this will conflict with your Tegra
PCIe driver series? If it doesn't, this patch can go through any
relevant PCI tree. If it does, we may have to take this through the
Tegra tree after merging the dependencies, or defer it to later.

On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:20:13AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

On 08/01/2012 09:54 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:

quoted

From: Jiang Liu <redacted>

Use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify PCIe ARM implementation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <redacted>

This is probably fine from my perspective assuming the underlying PCI
API implementation is OKd by relevant people.

Thierry, can you comment on whether this will conflict with your Tegra
PCIe driver series? If it doesn't, this patch can go through any
relevant PCI tree. If it does, we may have to take this through the
Tegra tree after merging the dependencies, or defer it to later.

I haven't touched those lines. tegra_pcie_relax_enable() only uses
generic PCI functions so I don't expect any conflicts. git blame
confirms that those lines haven't been changed in about 2 years.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120802/eee09477/attachment-0001.sig>

On 08/01/2012 09:54 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:

From: Jiang Liu <redacted>

Use PCIe capabilities access functions to simplify PCIe ARM implementation.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <redacted>

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>