[GIT PULL] i.MX fixes for -rc

Hi Arnd, Olof,

Please pull the following i.MX fixes for -rc

Thanks
 Sascha


The following changes since commit 6887a4131da3adaab011613776d865f4bcfb5678:

  Linux 3.5-rc5 (2012-06-30 16:08:57 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git tags/v3.5-imx-fixes

for you to fetch changes up to c520c921eacdced7e2095ba6cbbb9921906c7b67:

  ARM: imx: assert SCC gate stays enabled (2012-07-04 09:38:29 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
ARM i.MX fixes for v3.5-rc5

----------------------------------------------------------------
Fabio Estevam (1):
      ARM: imx27_visstrim_m10: Do not include <asm/system.h>

Uwe Kleine-K?nig (1):
      ARM: imx: assert SCC gate stays enabled

 arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx35.c               |    9 ++++++++-
 arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx27_visstrim_m10.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

On Wednesday 04 July 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:

Hi Arnd, Olof,

Please pull the following i.MX fixes for -rc

Thanks, pulled into the fixes branch. I plan to send out fixes tomorrow
to Linus.

Uwe Kleine-K?nig (1):
      ARM: imx: assert SCC gate stays enabled

Is this something that should have been marked for stable, or was
it just recently introduced? The description suggests the former.

	Arnd

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:49:22AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Wednesday 04 July 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:

quoted

Hi Arnd, Olof,

Please pull the following i.MX fixes for -rc

Thanks, pulled into the fixes branch. I plan to send out fixes tomorrow
to Linus.

quoted

Uwe Kleine-K?nig (1):
      ARM: imx: assert SCC gate stays enabled

Is this something that should have been marked for stable, or was
it just recently introduced? The description suggests the former.

The bug was introduced in the last merge window, so not suitable for
stable.

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

On Wednesday 04 July 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:

quoted

Is this something that should have been marked for stable, or was
it just recently introduced? The description suggests the former.

The bug was introduced in the last merge window, so not suitable for
stable.

Ok, thanks for the confirmation.

	Arnd