Hi,

Yeah, there was some confusion earlier, and I noticed that when
staging the branches for Linus last night. I'll rebuild for-next
tonight and take care of it then, thanks for the reminder!


-Olof

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Paul Gortmaker
[off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Olof,

This change:

- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?id.o usb.o timer.o
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?id.o pins.o usb.o timer.o

breaks the u8500_defconfig as follows:

make[2]: *** No rule to make target `arch/arm/mach-ux500/pins.o', needed
by `arch/arm/mach-ux500/built-in.o'. ?Stop.
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-ux500/] Error 2
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2

A bisect shows the following:

cda6f4d8cae969e08e6662573b538db73191873b is the first bad commit
commit cda6f4d8cae969e08e6662573b538db73191873b
Author: Olof Johansson [off-list ref]
Date: ? Wed May 16 14:47:24 2012 -0700

? ?ARM: ux500: fix mismerge in for-next

? ?Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson [off-list ref]

:040000 040000 abc42227f7daa6a7ff6153e0908add25ffb38a54
45d2618822e6075aea188089191791091c2e5c38 M ? ? ?arch
bisect run success

The linux-next fail is here:
? ? ? ?http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/6348609/

Can you have a look please?

Thanks,
Paul.