From: Paul Parsons <hidden> Date: 2012-03-09 14:57:56
The existing pcmcia platform_device structure is not used and is not needed by
the pending hx4700 PCMCIA/CF support. So let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <redacted>
---
V1:
This was originally included in the pending hx4700 PCMCIA/CF support, but it is
unrelated. Consequently this does not need to wait for the pending ARM SA11x0 /
PXA / SoC-common PCMCIA cleanups.
diff -uprN clean-3.3-rc6/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c linux-3.3-rc6/arch/arm/mach-pxa/hx4700.c
From: Philipp Zabel <hidden> Date: 2012-03-09 17:35:41
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Paul Parsons [off-list ref] wrote:
The existing pcmcia platform_device structure is not used and is not needed by
the pending hx4700 PCMCIA/CF support. So let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <redacted>
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <redacted>
regards
Philipp
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Paul Parsons [off-list ref] wrote:
The existing pcmcia platform_device structure is not used and is not needed by
the pending hx4700 PCMCIA/CF support. So let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <redacted>
Excuse me to response late. Will hx4700 support PCMCIA driver?
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Haojian Zhuang
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Paul Parsons [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The existing pcmcia platform_device structure is not used and is not needed by
the pending hx4700 PCMCIA/CF support. So let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <redacted>
Excuse me to response late. Will hx4700 support PCMCIA driver?
Oh. I missed one patch. Please ignore my comments.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Philipp Zabel [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Paul Parsons [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The existing pcmcia platform_device structure is not used and is not needed by
the pending hx4700 PCMCIA/CF support. So let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <redacted>