[PATCH] mfd: mc13xxx: add I2C support fix building for v3.4

Subsystems: multifunction devices (mfd), the rest

STALE5239d

7 messages, 3 authors, 2012-03-29 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] mfd: mc13xxx: add I2C support fix building for v3.4

From: Alex Gershgorin <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-28 14:09:29

This patch fixes the compilation errors after the patches
from series mc13xxx-add-I2C-support-V4 were applied.

Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin <redacted>
---
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig        |    2 ++
 drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index c3fbc5e..2119732 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ config MFD_MC13XXX
 	depends on SPI_MASTER || I2C
 	select MFD_CORE
 	select MFD_MC13783
+	select REGMAP_I2C if I2C
+	select REGMAP_SPI if SPI_MASTER
 	help
 	  Enable support for the Freescale MC13783 and MC13892 PMICs.
 	  This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
index 31dbf91..5a60273 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_add_subdevice(struct mc13xxx *mc13xxx, const char *format)
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 static int mc13xxx_probe_flags_dt(struct mc13xxx *mc13xxx)
 {
-	struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev.of_node;
+	struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev->of_node;
 
 	if (!np)
 		return -ENODEV;
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH] mfd: mc13xxx: add I2C support fix building for v3.4

From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-28 14:40:21

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:01:13PM +0200, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
quoted hunk
index c3fbc5e..2119732 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ config MFD_MC13XXX
 	depends on SPI_MASTER || I2C
 	select MFD_CORE
 	select MFD_MC13783
+	select REGMAP_I2C if I2C
+	select REGMAP_SPI if SPI_MASTER
 	help
 	  Enable support for the Freescale MC13783 and MC13892 PMICs.
 	  This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
I'd really expect this to be squashed into the patches adding the regmap
usage for I2C and SPI, how can those patches work without this?
quoted hunk
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
index 31dbf91..5a60273 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_add_subdevice(struct mc13xxx *mc13xxx, const char *format)
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 static int mc13xxx_probe_flags_dt(struct mc13xxx *mc13xxx)
 {
-	struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev.of_node;
+	struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev->of_node;
This looks like it should be submitted properly as a bug fix for
inclusion on 3.4 or squashed into whatever change introduces the issue
if it's not present in 3.4.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120328/161ab84e/attachment.sig>

RE: [PATCH] mfd: mc13xxx: add I2C support fix building for v3.4

From: Alex Gershgorin <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-28 16:31:35

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:01:13PM +0200, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
quoted hunk
index c3fbc5e..2119732 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ config MFD_MC13XXX
      depends on SPI_MASTER || I2C
      select MFD_CORE
      select MFD_MC13783
+     select REGMAP_I2C if I2C
+     select REGMAP_SPI if SPI_MASTER
      help
        Enable support for the Freescale MC13783 and MC13892 PMICs.
        This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
quoted
I'd really expect this to be squashed into the patches adding the regmap
usage for I2C and SPI, how can those patches work without this?
You ask me about another solution?
 
quoted hunk
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
index 31dbf91..5a60273 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_add_subdevice(struct mc13xxx *mc13xxx, const char *format)
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 static int mc13xxx_probe_flags_dt(struct mc13xxx *mc13xxx)
 {
-     struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev.of_node;
+     struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev->of_node;
quoted
This looks like it should be submitted properly as a bug fix for
inclusion on 3.4 or squashed into whatever change introduces the issue
if it's not present in 3.4.
Ok 

  

Re: [PATCH] mfd: mc13xxx: add I2C support fix building for v3.4

From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-28 16:35:17

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 06:31:04PM +0200, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:01:13PM +0200, Alex Gershgorin wrote:
quoted
+     select REGMAP_I2C if I2C
+     select REGMAP_SPI if SPI_MASTER
quoted
quoted
I'd really expect this to be squashed into the patches adding the regmap
usage for I2C and SPI, how can those patches work without this?
You ask me about another solution?
I'm saying either I'm missing something or this needs to be fixed in the
patches that introduce the regmap usage.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120328/6b5ebf67/attachment.sig>

RE: [PATCH] mfd: mc13xxx: add I2C support fix building for v3.4

From: Alex Gershgorin <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-28 17:39:25

 
You ask me about another solution?
quoted
I'm saying either I'm missing something or this needs to be fixed in the
patches that introduce the regmap usage.
You understood correctly, it took me time to understand :-)
No problem I can split this patch:
quoted
+     select REGMAP_I2C if I2C
+     select REGMAP_SPI if SPI_MASTER
It will go to  v4 mfd: mc13xxx-core: use regmap for register access, 

Only the second part will be in this patch

-	struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev.of_node;
+	struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev->of_node;

 

Re: [PATCH] mfd: mc13xxx: add I2C support fix building for v3.4

From: Marc Reilly <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-28 21:43:55

Hi,

As Mark Brown already said, these changes should be squashed into a new 
version of the patches.

On Thursday, March 29, 2012 01:01:13 AM Alex Gershgorin wrote:
quoted hunk
This patch fixes the compilation errors after the patches
from series mc13xxx-add-I2C-support-V4 were applied.

Signed-off-by: Alex Gershgorin <redacted>
---
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig        |    2 ++
 drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index c3fbc5e..2119732 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -577,6 +577,8 @@ config MFD_MC13XXX
 	depends on SPI_MASTER || I2C
 	select MFD_CORE
 	select MFD_MC13783
+	select REGMAP_I2C if I2C
This can go under the "config MFD_MC13XXX_I2C" entry in patch 4/4 (the "if 
I2C" won't be needed)
+	select REGMAP_SPI if SPI_MASTER
This can go under the "config MFD_MC13XXX_SPI" entry in patch 3/4

quoted hunk
 	help
 	  Enable support for the Freescale MC13783 and MC13892 PMICs.
 	  This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
index 31dbf91..5a60273 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mc13xxx-core.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int mc13xxx_add_subdevice(struct mc13xxx
*mc13xxx, const char *format) #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 static int mc13xxx_probe_flags_dt(struct mc13xxx *mc13xxx)
 {
-	struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev.of_node;
+	struct device_node *np = mc13xxx->dev->of_node;
Good catch! This can be fixed up in 4/4

@Alex, you seen keen to do this, so I'll leave it to you :)
Otherwise, I'm happy to do it, just let me know.

Cheers,
Marc

RE: [PATCH] mfd: mc13xxx: add I2C support fix building for v3.4

From: Alex Gershgorin <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-29 07:52:10

Hi Marc,
@Alex, you seen keen to do this, so I'll leave it to you :)
Otherwise, I'm happy to do it, just let me know.
No problem, I would gladly give it to you :-)

Regards,
Alex Gershgorin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help