[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: fix mailbox init code
Subsystems:
arm port , omap2+ support , the rest
STALE5281d
5 messages,
4 authors,
2012-02-23 · open the first message on its own page
Fix this:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c: In function 'omap2_mbox_probe':
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: 'omap2_mboxes' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: for each function it appears in.)
Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 && !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
missing omap2_mboxes declaration.
In addition, make sure we declare the right mailbox instances for 2430.
Reported-by: Russell King <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <redacted>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Hiroshi Doyu <redacted>
Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <redacted>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
index 609ea2d..415a6f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c @@ -281,8 +281,16 @@ static struct omap_mbox mbox_iva_info = {
. ops = & omap2_mbox_ops ,
. priv = & omap2_mbox_iva_priv ,
};
+ #endif
- struct omap_mbox * omap2_mboxes [] = { & mbox_dsp_info , & mbox_iva_info , NULL };
+ #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
+ struct omap_mbox * omap2_mboxes [] = {
+ & mbox_dsp_info ,
+ #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
+ & mbox_iva_info ,
+ #endif
+ NULL
+ };
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) --
1.7.5.4
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 14:23:35, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
[...]
Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 && !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
missing omap2_mboxes declaration. [...]
-struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = { &mbox_dsp_info, &mbox_iva_info, NULL };
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
+struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = {
+ &mbox_dsp_info,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
+ &mbox_iva_info,
+#endif
+ NULL
+};
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav [off-list ref] wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 14:23:35, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
[...] quoted
Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 && !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
missing omap2_mboxes declaration. [...] quoted
-struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = { &mbox_dsp_info, &mbox_iva_info, NULL };
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
+struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = {
+ ? ? &mbox_dsp_info,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
+ ? ? &mbox_iva_info,
+#endif
+ ? ? NULL
+};
?#endif
?#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
I'll rebase/repost this series:
[PATCH 0/7] OMAP: mailbox: removing static declarations
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/59620
In the meantime I would appreciate comments.
Regards,
Omar
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav [off-list ref] wrote: Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
Care to propose something specific (which is viable for the -rc cycle) ?
Thanks,
Ohad.
* Ohad Ben-Cohen [off-list ref] [120223 08:32]: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav [off-list ref] wrote: quoted Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
Care to propose something specific (which is viable for the -rc cycle) ?
This is pretty much the minimal change for -rc cycle so I'll apply
this into fixes.
Regards,
Tony