[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: fix mailbox init code

Subsystems: arm port, omap2+ support, the rest

STALE5281d

5 messages, 4 authors, 2012-02-23 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: fix mailbox init code

From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-23 08:53:35

Fix this:

arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c: In function 'omap2_mbox_probe':
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: 'omap2_mboxes' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: for each function it appears in.)

Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 && !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
missing omap2_mboxes declaration.

In addition, make sure we declare the right mailbox instances for 2430.

Reported-by: Russell King <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <redacted>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Hiroshi Doyu <redacted>
Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c |   10 +++++++++-
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
index 609ea2d..415a6f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
@@ -281,8 +281,16 @@ static struct omap_mbox mbox_iva_info = {
 	.ops	= &omap2_mbox_ops,
 	.priv	= &omap2_mbox_iva_priv,
 };
+#endif
 
-struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = { &mbox_dsp_info, &mbox_iva_info, NULL };
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
+struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = {
+	&mbox_dsp_info,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
+	&mbox_iva_info,
+#endif
+	NULL
+};
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
-- 
1.7.5.4

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: fix mailbox init code

From: Bedia, Vaibhav <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-23 09:18:01

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 14:23:35, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
[...]
Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 && !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
missing omap2_mboxes declaration.
[...]
 
-struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = { &mbox_dsp_info, &mbox_iva_info, NULL };
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
+struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = {
+	&mbox_dsp_info,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
+	&mbox_iva_info,
+#endif
+	NULL
+};
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: fix mailbox init code

From: Ramirez Luna, Omar <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-23 16:44:33

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 14:23:35, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
[...]
quoted
Which happens on CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 && !CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420, due to
missing omap2_mboxes declaration.
[...]
quoted
-struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = { &mbox_dsp_info, &mbox_iva_info, NULL };
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2
+struct omap_mbox *omap2_mboxes[] = {
+ ? ? &mbox_dsp_info,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420
+ ? ? &mbox_iva_info,
+#endif
+ ? ? NULL
+};
?#endif

?#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)
Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
I'll rebase/repost this series:

[PATCH 0/7] OMAP: mailbox: removing static declarations
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/59620

In the meantime I would appreciate comments.

Regards,

Omar

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: fix mailbox init code

From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-23 17:04:09

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav [off-list ref] wrote:
Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
Care to propose something specific (which is viable for the -rc cycle) ?

Thanks,
Ohad.

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: fix mailbox init code

From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: 2012-02-23 19:27:39

* Ohad Ben-Cohen [off-list ref] [120223 08:32]:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Bedia, Vaibhav [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Instead of adding more #ifs can they be completely removed please?
Care to propose something specific (which is viable for the -rc cycle) ?
This is pretty much the minimal change for -rc cycle so I'll apply
this into fixes.

Regards,

Tony
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help